who wants to go first?
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
You know you want to go first so get it started for us Boss!!!
You know you want to go first so get it started for us Boss!!!

Bad-Company
offline
offline
Originally posted by theboss
Omaha, Reno, Akron, Chicago
damn..ur good...premonition? or did you just read it like everyone else?Edit- I retract...gg alby.
Omaha, Reno, Akron, Chicago
damn..ur good...premonition? or did you just read it like everyone else?Edit- I retract...gg alby.
Last edited Sep 6, 2008 20:33:41
Warlock
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crotin
omg Chicago...what an upset
Not really that big of an upset TBPH, Klamath came the closest to beating us in the regular season. I think they match up against us very well, pulling out the OT win this time. Plus I think that we got caught looking ahead and got out-coached some.
Klamath is a very good team. Unfortunately this loss stings pretty bad, because this is the 3rd season in a row we've been upset in the play-offs (I firmly believe that the other two times we got screwed by the sim)... this time though, it looked fair and square, with the better prepared team getting the win. As opposed to a DE in our backfield every down or the sim running the same play, over and over again, for most of the game.
omg Chicago...what an upset
Not really that big of an upset TBPH, Klamath came the closest to beating us in the regular season. I think they match up against us very well, pulling out the OT win this time. Plus I think that we got caught looking ahead and got out-coached some.
Klamath is a very good team. Unfortunately this loss stings pretty bad, because this is the 3rd season in a row we've been upset in the play-offs (I firmly believe that the other two times we got screwed by the sim)... this time though, it looked fair and square, with the better prepared team getting the win. As opposed to a DE in our backfield every down or the sim running the same play, over and over again, for most of the game.
Swampgator75
offline
offline
Great Game Chicago. That was a lot of fun to watch once again!
A comment was made after our earlier match up that our first game against each other wasn't as close as the score showed. I hope we showed tonight that it very much was.
Again, great game!
A comment was made after our earlier match up that our first game against each other wasn't as close as the score showed. I hope we showed tonight that it very much was.
Again, great game!
Warlock
offline
offline
Originally posted by Swampgator75
Great Game Chicago. That was a lot of fun to watch once again!
A comment was made after our earlier match up that our first game against each other wasn't as close as the score showed. I hope we showed tonight that it very much was.
Again, great game!
This game is a totally different animal. The first game wasn't as close as the score. You guys scored a TD, in the last minute of that game, making it much closer on the scoreboard. That isn't to say that it wasn't a close game, merely that it wasn't as close as the score showed. I.E. we weren't in danger of losing, barring some miraculous play to end the game... we put the game totally out of reach with two minutes left and lead the entire 4th quarter.
But anyways, not really important. I didn't say "the game wasn't as close as the score showed" to disrespect your team in anyway. It was merely an observation, based on how that game unfolded.
This game, your D showed up even stronger this time and we stalled a bunch of drives... which lead to FGs a couple times in the first meeting. Our D kept us it close, but in the end we just couldn't sustain enough scoring drives to finish you off. You got the OT kick-off and ended it.
Great Game Chicago. That was a lot of fun to watch once again!
A comment was made after our earlier match up that our first game against each other wasn't as close as the score showed. I hope we showed tonight that it very much was.
Again, great game!
This game is a totally different animal. The first game wasn't as close as the score. You guys scored a TD, in the last minute of that game, making it much closer on the scoreboard. That isn't to say that it wasn't a close game, merely that it wasn't as close as the score showed. I.E. we weren't in danger of losing, barring some miraculous play to end the game... we put the game totally out of reach with two minutes left and lead the entire 4th quarter.
But anyways, not really important. I didn't say "the game wasn't as close as the score showed" to disrespect your team in anyway. It was merely an observation, based on how that game unfolded.
This game, your D showed up even stronger this time and we stalled a bunch of drives... which lead to FGs a couple times in the first meeting. Our D kept us it close, but in the end we just couldn't sustain enough scoring drives to finish you off. You got the OT kick-off and ended it.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























