User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > European Pro League > Western Europe Conference > Season 4 Interconference Bedlam
Page:
 
Hampe
offline
Link
 
Sooooo.....can we agree to take the scrimmage games a bit more serious this time around? I remember some people were talking about organizing an interconference competition (in which we'd have to use up or pay for new friendlies), but here we have a perfectly good interconference competition free of charge.

I'm going to be keeping track of all interconference games like last year, and at least I will be counting the results as official. So please, if you can find it in your heart to not start your DT at QB and your P at HB, I'd appreciate it (*cough* Raggies *cough*). It would be nice to know which conference is objectively better than the other and deserves bragging rights.

What do you guys think?
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
I reckon I'd be wiling to have one scrimmage game dedicated as one we take serious, but the others (should there be any ) are for my players to have some fun.

Little enough to do at the moment to keep players interested and happy, so if I can help that with providing a bit of fun by letting them decide which position they'd like to play I will do that, sorry.
 
Hampe
offline
Link
 
FINE.


But I'm still going to make fun of you when you guys lose 200-0 because you put your 2nd string kicker in at QB.

[EDIT] - But that was the compromise that Mike came up with at the end of last season. He had said something like everyone take the week 16 game and first scrimmage games seriously.

Last edited Aug 27, 2008 05:53:35
 
boomer82
offline
Link
 
Well I think most teams are going to be taking Week 16 seriously, due to the fact their playoff position might depend on it.
 
Manchild
offline
Link
 
I think you can pretty much chalk up a win for Alpha from FTA.
 
coreyls18
offline
Link
 
I dont think we should count seeds 14-16.
 
Kevin Smith
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by coreyls18
I dont think we should count seeds 14-16.


Well, gutted teams like Valencia and Sandford shouldn´t count, but a team lik DFools should.
 
JD Cuda
offline
Link
 
I enjoy playing around with my defensive settings in scrimmages, but I'm sure most people on Toledo would agree to taking at least one of the games seriously.
 
Row Berr
offline
Link
 
Valhalla can feel free to not take week 16 seriously at all... would be much appreciated
 
helluin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Row Berr
Valhalla can feel free to not take week 16 seriously at all... would be much appreciated


Aye aye.
 
shmingus
offline
Link
 
why so serious?
 
Hampe
offline
Link
 
Here's the results from week 16:


Total Conference W-L
Alpha - 7-9
Zeta - 9-7

Total Conference PF-PA
Alpha - 526-353
Zeta - 353-526

Playoff Teams W-L
Alpha - 4-4
Zeta - 6-2

Playoff Teams PF-PA
Alpha - 353-137
Zeta - 196-144

Non-Playoff Teams W-L
Alpha - 3-5
Zeta - 3-5

Non-Playoff Teams PF-PA
Alpha - 173-216
Zeta - 157-382
Last edited Sep 4, 2008 03:57:01
 
maizenhops
offline
Link
 
zeta pwns
 
Hampe
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kalkmanc
zeta pwns

QFT.





And also:

Cosign.
 
Kevin Smith
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hampe
Here's the results from week 16:




Playoff Teams W-L
Alpha - 4-4
Zeta - 6-2



 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.