ive only made minimal plays in the D ai and i went back and checked. in a particular nickel set i have it set for the SS to blitz. thats the only mod i made to a three rcvr set. yet ive found several instances where my FS has to cover a WR and not a CB. and it is not the FS as CB3 i only have CB 1 and 2.
NotRippedYet
offline
offline
One of your outputs is overriding. Input the EXACT situation into the defensive AI tester and it should tell you which play it's calling so you can track it down.
NotRippedYet
offline
offline
Originally posted by wienerpop
situations later on there were three CBs.
Can you post the play in question so we can look at it?
situations later on there were three CBs.
Can you post the play in question so we can look at it?
Romeorr
offline
offline
if nothing matches then it chooses your base D... you need to make sure that you are creating the right defense for the formation
Nixx
offline
offline
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
GIEFF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
Public_Ebony
offline
offline
Originally posted by GIEFF
Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
How?
You can have a base defense for 2 WR's...then you can make a base defense for 3 WR's...finally you can make a base defense for 4-5 WR's.
Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
How?
You can have a base defense for 2 WR's...then you can make a base defense for 3 WR's...finally you can make a base defense for 4-5 WR's.
Mightyhalo
offline
offline
Here is a good example of what can happen with a 3 wr set when the defense only has 2 CB's in the game.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=120191&pbp_id=6546261
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=120191&pbp_id=6546261
Last edited Aug 27, 2008 20:51:26
GIEFF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Public_Ebony
Originally posted by GIEFF
Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
How?
You can have a base defense for 2 WR's...then you can make a base defense for 3 WR's...finally you can make a base defense for 4-5 WR's.
Single back and Shotgun -3 wide formations both have 3 WR's.
One formation has only passes - one has both passes and runs. Do you see why it is beneficial to call different defenses for each formation? You don't have to worry about the run against the shotgun, but if you only worry about the # of WR's, then you do have to stay honest and defend the run because of the runs out of Single Back formation.
Originally posted by GIEFF
Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by wienerpop
under opponents formation i chose single back.
Don't use formations, just go by number of WRs.
Bad advice - going by formations allows you much more flexibility.
How?
You can have a base defense for 2 WR's...then you can make a base defense for 3 WR's...finally you can make a base defense for 4-5 WR's.
Single back and Shotgun -3 wide formations both have 3 WR's.
One formation has only passes - one has both passes and runs. Do you see why it is beneficial to call different defenses for each formation? You don't have to worry about the run against the shotgun, but if you only worry about the # of WR's, then you do have to stay honest and defend the run because of the runs out of Single Back formation.
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by GIEFF
Single back and Shotgun -3 wide formations both have 3 WR's.
One formation has only passes - one has both passes and runs. Do you see why it is beneficial to call different defenses for each formation? You don't have to worry about the run against the shotgun, but if you only worry about the # of WR's, then you do have to stay honest and defend the run because of the runs out of Single Back formation.
Honestly, that's something that needs to be looked into. Having a formation with a HB in the game that can't get the ball is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of, perhaps aside from there being 0 pass plays in the GL offense.
Single back and Shotgun -3 wide formations both have 3 WR's.
One formation has only passes - one has both passes and runs. Do you see why it is beneficial to call different defenses for each formation? You don't have to worry about the run against the shotgun, but if you only worry about the # of WR's, then you do have to stay honest and defend the run because of the runs out of Single Back formation.
Honestly, that's something that needs to be looked into. Having a formation with a HB in the game that can't get the ball is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of, perhaps aside from there being 0 pass plays in the GL offense.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
