Ouch, LV would hurt if they had depth, our CB squad getting some training on winning contested balls this week I think.
HATEMOBSTER
offline
offline
Maybe we should quit telling them that lol. So they don't go out and get depth and whoop all our asses.
TtD
offline
offline
Were some interesting results last night as far as these things go, Fresno put in a good effort against Dallas and look strong, San Diego resurface cementing RGB as a likely 9th or 10th spot team come end of season. A few teams with walkover wins to keep things ticking, and Tallahassee looking annoyingly strong for now.
Quiet game next for us as we go against the rebuilding Springville, should be ugly but it will give us a chance to level up some players and work on a few weaknesses.
Quiet game next for us as we go against the rebuilding Springville, should be ugly but it will give us a chance to level up some players and work on a few weaknesses.
HATEMOBSTER
offline
offline
From you TtD, I'll take annoyingly strong lol. 3-0. Not too bad for a team that didn't get it's 3rd win until week 9 last season. Next week is definitely one of our biggest games of the season though.
HATEMOBSTER
offline
offline
Hmmm that wasn't from me. A player on my team owns Warsaw. He's probably just looking for more help. We've got some quality guys on there.
rainier
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greenday4537
When I get home from work, I'll post the projected results for Week 4.
Satchmo only predicts who will win, not the score. I track the same thing and actually stated yesterday that I wouldn't post the scores since they were pretty odd in a lot of cases.
When I get home from work, I'll post the projected results for Week 4.
Satchmo only predicts who will win, not the score. I track the same thing and actually stated yesterday that I wouldn't post the scores since they were pretty odd in a lot of cases.
Greenday4537
offline
offline
Originally posted by rainier
Originally posted by Greenday4537
When I get home from work, I'll post the projected results for Week 4.
Satchmo only predicts who will win, not the score. I track the same thing and actually stated yesterday that I wouldn't post the scores since they were pretty odd in a lot of cases.
By the end of the season, I think it'll work better.
Originally posted by Greenday4537
When I get home from work, I'll post the projected results for Week 4.
Satchmo only predicts who will win, not the score. I track the same thing and actually stated yesterday that I wouldn't post the scores since they were pretty odd in a lot of cases.
By the end of the season, I think it'll work better.
rainier
offline
offline
It does, but it doesn't predict the score. Only the outcomes. With the exception of two or three games this upcoming week, the scores are actually reasonable though.
HATEMOBSTER
offline
offline
The only outcome I wanna see is the Teabaggers winning it all lol. Can you tell me that?
rainier
offline
offline
Rk Team........... W L T % PF PA
1 COS Cougars.... 5 11 0 31% 498 604
2 Roswell Space Pirates 9 7 0 56% 1,087 587
3 Las Vegas Outlaws 1 15 0 6% 226 4,275
4 Tucson Nighthawks 14 2 0 88% 1,496 272
5 Raving Mad Dawgs 11 5 0 69% 819 188
6 Anchorage Maulers 7 9 0 44% 890 564
7 Fresno Jaguars.. 7 8 0 47% 683 440
8 Tallahassee Teabaggers 16 0 0 100% 1,082 78
9 RGB Berzerk 7 8 0 47% 775 414
10 San Diego Blaze 8 8 0 50% 1,030 412
11 So Cal Beach Bums 3 13 0 19% 224 893
12 Dallas Strikers 12 4 0 75% 1,009 300
13 Las Vegas Legends 8 8 0 50% 660 326
1 COS Cougars.... 5 11 0 31% 498 604
2 Roswell Space Pirates 9 7 0 56% 1,087 587
3 Las Vegas Outlaws 1 15 0 6% 226 4,275
4 Tucson Nighthawks 14 2 0 88% 1,496 272
5 Raving Mad Dawgs 11 5 0 69% 819 188
6 Anchorage Maulers 7 9 0 44% 890 564
7 Fresno Jaguars.. 7 8 0 47% 683 440
8 Tallahassee Teabaggers 16 0 0 100% 1,082 78
9 RGB Berzerk 7 8 0 47% 775 414
10 San Diego Blaze 8 8 0 50% 1,030 412
11 So Cal Beach Bums 3 13 0 19% 224 893
12 Dallas Strikers 12 4 0 75% 1,009 300
13 Las Vegas Legends 8 8 0 50% 660 326
rainier
offline
offline
That's blob of numbers is projected wins/loses through game 3.
Last edited Aug 7, 2008 08:38:17
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























