Hmm?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Anyone figure out how useful clutch is?
Kinda hard to prove. It doesn't flash like 'spin' or others on replays and it's so ambiguous (effecting several different aspects) that you can't stat track it. I'm not quite as skeptical as JD about it... but I'm not a fan of it either choosing it only if I've no better options... which I usually do.
TJ Spikes
online
online
Originally posted by haole
certainly not as effective as the Camel Clutch was
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Iron_Sheik
certainly not as effective as the Camel Clutch was
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Iron_Sheik
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by haole
certainly not as effective as the Camel Clutch was
The Cobra Clutch was better.
certainly not as effective as the Camel Clutch was
The Cobra Clutch was better.
don't know, but not against putting like 2-4 points in it on a KR/PR and accepting whatever happens
jdbolick
offline
offline
I've been on teams that had 15 in Clutch on every offensive and defensive starter. There was no noticeable effect.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I've been on teams that had 15 in Clutch on every offensive and defensive starter. There was no noticeable effect.
So then what you are saying then JD is that clutch is broken.
I've been on teams that had 15 in Clutch on every offensive and defensive starter. There was no noticeable effect.
So then what you are saying then JD is that clutch is broken.
Sly
offline
offline
I had one player with 15 clutch who won 7 MVP trophies - 1 in WL, 3 more in Pro, and 3 more in Elite. Jus' sayin'.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I've been on teams that had 15 in Clutch on every offensive and defensive starter. There was no noticeable effect.
Key word is noticeable. When you have a VA that is supposed to effect as many things as Clutch is supposed to then there's really no way to SEE it working. I do think it does what it says it does... how often and how much effect is the debate. Which is why I agree with JD about it not being worth selecting as a 'primary' VA but, if you've filled all your majors up, and have anything left, then maybe.
I've been on teams that had 15 in Clutch on every offensive and defensive starter. There was no noticeable effect.
Key word is noticeable. When you have a VA that is supposed to effect as many things as Clutch is supposed to then there's really no way to SEE it working. I do think it does what it says it does... how often and how much effect is the debate. Which is why I agree with JD about it not being worth selecting as a 'primary' VA but, if you've filled all your majors up, and have anything left, then maybe.
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Key word is noticeable. When you have a VA that is supposed to effect as many things as Clutch is supposed to then there's really no way to SEE it working. I do think it does what it says it does... how often and how much effect is the debate. Which is why I agree with JD about it not being worth selecting as a 'primary' VA but, if you've filled all your majors up, and have anything left, then maybe.
I think your explanation in plain English makes good sense. But I think JD's post is short-hand for "no titles while featuring it", which would make your suggestion about (paraphrasing) "only if you are more or less done and you have nothing left" applicable.
Key word is noticeable. When you have a VA that is supposed to effect as many things as Clutch is supposed to then there's really no way to SEE it working. I do think it does what it says it does... how often and how much effect is the debate. Which is why I agree with JD about it not being worth selecting as a 'primary' VA but, if you've filled all your majors up, and have anything left, then maybe.
I think your explanation in plain English makes good sense. But I think JD's post is short-hand for "no titles while featuring it", which would make your suggestion about (paraphrasing) "only if you are more or less done and you have nothing left" applicable.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
