Link cos I cant find bugger all
and
Help cos I cant remember
If I play a SS @ LB whats the penalty ?
Thanks
ZZForum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Link or help needed
zz man
online
online
Link cos I cant find bugger all
and
Help cos I cant remember
If I play a SS @ LB whats the penalty ?
Thanks
ZZno one knows the exact penalty.
probably a pretty fucking horrible idea though.
probably a pretty fucking horrible idea though.
OOP penalty for one position over is 3% and 5% forward or back I.E. safety to LB 3 and LB to DE 5. As I I saw it with my OOP team safeties are considered secondary unit but in line penalty wise with OLB's. Unfortunately I do not have a chart for it as of yet.
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
no one knows the exact penalty.
probably a pretty fucking horrible idea though.
On the contrary as a SS is ideal build type for certain LB position/tasks. Can actually over come the penalty with advantage of arch difference. A FS however would not be my choice
no one knows the exact penalty.
probably a pretty fucking horrible idea though.
On the contrary as a SS is ideal build type for certain LB position/tasks. Can actually over come the penalty with advantage of arch difference. A FS however would not be my choice
Originally posted by skibodragula
On the contrary as a SS is ideal build type for certain LB position/tasks. Can actually over come the penalty with advantage of arch difference. A FS however would not be my choice
no position is ideal for another position.
On the contrary as a SS is ideal build type for certain LB position/tasks. Can actually over come the penalty with advantage of arch difference. A FS however would not be my choice
no position is ideal for another position.
Originally posted by skibodragula
No but when you need one...fight the power!
Exactly. There is a progression from 'minor penalty' to 'major disaster' for every single position in the game. Most are common sense when figuring out... like a Kicker makes a better punter in a pinch than a DT does, eh?
For the OP's question I think the progression of positions when looking for OOP damage is as follows;
A SS playing FS is the least penalty, probably right around 3%.
A SS playing LB would be next on that list... probably around 4 to 5% damage.
A SS playing CB would be nest on that list and I wouldn't advise playing a SS anywhere but those 3 spots to avoid major damage to it's abilities.
A FS is pretty much the same except flip the LB and CB spots.
Hope this helps you Mr. Top.
No but when you need one...fight the power!
Exactly. There is a progression from 'minor penalty' to 'major disaster' for every single position in the game. Most are common sense when figuring out... like a Kicker makes a better punter in a pinch than a DT does, eh?
For the OP's question I think the progression of positions when looking for OOP damage is as follows;
A SS playing FS is the least penalty, probably right around 3%.
A SS playing LB would be next on that list... probably around 4 to 5% damage.
A SS playing CB would be nest on that list and I wouldn't advise playing a SS anywhere but those 3 spots to avoid major damage to it's abilities.
A FS is pretty much the same except flip the LB and CB spots.
Hope this helps you Mr. Top.
zz man
online
online
Lol and thankyou all....Penalty not as big/bad as I thought although with more "play" in the DPP and substituions it would be unnecessary.....SS would be in a TE cover role but I want the LB elsewhere lol....
So thanks...... its time for some musing....then moseying on down to my lil ole Pearly Gates for some lovin' !!
Originally posted by zz man
Lol and thankyou all....Penalty not as big/bad as I thought although with more "play" in the DPP and substituions it would be unnecessary.....SS would be in a TE cover role but I want the LB elsewhere lol....
So thanks...... its time for some musing....then moseying on down to my lil ole Pearly Gates for some lovin' !!
theyre literally just making up numbers.
Lol and thankyou all....Penalty not as big/bad as I thought although with more "play" in the DPP and substituions it would be unnecessary.....SS would be in a TE cover role but I want the LB elsewhere lol....
So thanks...... its time for some musing....then moseying on down to my lil ole Pearly Gates for some lovin' !!
theyre literally just making up numbers.
Originally posted by lexden11
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
yeah i remember bort saying that too. pretty sure it was for SS/FS and one position over on OL or something.
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
yeah i remember bort saying that too. pretty sure it was for SS/FS and one position over on OL or something.
Jeebuz
offline
offline
If you need to play a safety at LB, you should probably start researching on how to pucker your butthole.
Originally posted by lexden11
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
General OOP is %5. One position over with arch similar works out to 3 or 4. Yes you should not do it if you can avoid it, but always a butt with a frog...some people need to fill in and SS at LB depending on arch and job, can actually work well.
Did I run an algorithm for the % no for my OOP team. Did I watch the numbers and test-yes. Couple other OOP goodies I learned as well so, no its not bort logic, but then again none of that shit is real
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
General OOP is %5. One position over with arch similar works out to 3 or 4. Yes you should not do it if you can avoid it, but always a butt with a frog...some people need to fill in and SS at LB depending on arch and job, can actually work well.
Did I run an algorithm for the % no for my OOP team. Did I watch the numbers and test-yes. Couple other OOP goodies I learned as well so, no its not bort logic, but then again none of that shit is real
Originally posted by skibodragula
Originally posted by lexden11
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
General OOP is %5. One position over with arch similar works out to 3 or 4. Yes you should not do it if you can avoid it, but always a butt with a frog...some people need to fill in and SS at LB depending on arch and job, can actually work well.
Did I run an algorithm for the % no for my OOP team. Did I watch the numbers and test-yes. Couple other OOP goodies I learned as well so, no its not bort logic, but then again none of that shit is real
Originally posted by lexden11
I thought that the minimum OOP penalty was 5%
General OOP is %5. One position over with arch similar works out to 3 or 4. Yes you should not do it if you can avoid it, but always a butt with a frog...some people need to fill in and SS at LB depending on arch and job, can actually work well.
Did I run an algorithm for the % no for my OOP team. Did I watch the numbers and test-yes. Couple other OOP goodies I learned as well so, no its not bort logic, but then again none of that shit is real
Really 
I forgot everyone is a math guy and has proof OOP numbers are what they are cause they ran a full OOP team for 2 seasons...I suck my bad for tryin' to help a guy out in a bind. Nobady worth a shit in this game has a bind, all perfect all dots all gold...the guy who asked is a fool and should bail outta GLB for even thinking it...its 2015 and bort is ded
I forgot everyone is a math guy and has proof OOP numbers are what they are cause they ran a full OOP team for 2 seasons...I suck my bad for tryin' to help a guy out in a bind. Nobady worth a shit in this game has a bind, all perfect all dots all gold...the guy who asked is a fool and should bail outta GLB for even thinking it...its 2015 and bort is dedYou are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
