Warrior General Games

This whole Mithgate thats happening now made me think. Is there really much difference in an agent owning a team and only having a QB and a WR and an agent owning a team and fills out the roster?

This seems unfair to me. Take this team for example. http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1594

He offense is 95% rush, But nobody says anything. Obviously we can't control what people spend their Flex on but this shouldn't be allowed in my opinion. It's not fair to every other agent that doesn't want to spend 100s of dollars in making a full squad.

This is laughable... and not even a debate.

And for this team he doesnt do 95% hb rush. Not even close.
72 passes
75 runs - Rushing QB
38 runs - FB
34 runs - Rushing QB
69 runs - Speed RB
29 runs - Power RB

Even if his entire offense was just HB rush that's still completely different from what Mith was doing.

Originally posted by coreyls18
This is laughable... and not even a debate.

And for this team he doesnt do 95% hb rush. Not even close.
72 passes
75 runs - Rushing QB
38 runs - FB
34 runs - Rushing QB
69 runs - Speed RB
29 runs - Power RB

I meant rush. Edited.

This isn't even remotely close to being similar to what mith was doing.

I thought of it because of the whole Mith thing.

Originally posted by MileHighShoes
Even if his entire offense was just HB rush that's still completely different from what Mith was doing.

This, imo.

Originally posted by jtrav21
This isn't even remotely close to being similar to what mith was doing.

Alright fair enough, But still.

Is it fair to do this? Should there be restrictions on the amount of Dots you can have on your own team?

Originally posted by Jack_MuFc
Alright fair enough, But still.

Is it fair to do this? Should there be restrictions on the amount of Dots you can have on your own team?

Why? If the guy wants to spend that kind of coin let him. He isn't doing it to manipulate anything. He is clearly trying to build the best team possible, which is great for competitive leagues especially in the minors. He has no advantage over any other well coordinated team, and has to dedicate quite a bit of time to keeping up with that roster. More power to him.

Originally posted by Jack_MuFc
Alright fair enough, But still.

Is it fair to do this? Should there be restrictions on the amount of Dots you can have on your own team?

Why? Bort loves these kinda people. Means they are putting money in Borts pockets. Personally I think it would be cool if we were all given the option to make a full team by ourselves. Im pretty damn close with my own team now but just couldnt make myself spend more money on the game to buy a few more flex.

Big deal, if someone wants to dump that kind of dough on a team, then why not. If you had the money u would too, we all would. Move on. I just wish the day would come when it would be affordable for me to do so as well

What is the difference between this one guy owning all his players and running 95% or 55 different people owning players and running 95%? There isn't a difference. It is all about the coordinating anyways.

I own a team of all my dots except for 2 and those 2 dots belong to my DC and the Co-owner. and I see it like this if I want to spend the money to build all the dots on my team. then it is none of anyone elses damn business. I build all the dots on my team to keep from dealing with dumbass people that can't build dots to save their lives or crybaby people that can't grasp a team concept and they feel their crappy dot needs to get all the touches even if it means the team loses. by me building my entire team there is whining or crying over playing time or touches.



so my advice to Jack_MuFc you worry about what you are doing and people like me that build our entire team will take care of ourselves.