At 400 FP a season, GLB would save some cash instead of paying for QB's and 3 boosts per season. Agents, whom have never been team owners can see a different side of GLB, maybe convincing them to stay instead of leaving like a lot have.
Forum > Suggestions > Instead of free dots, let agents buy teams
ClutchDreams
offline
offline
Was gonna -1 this and say it would reduce the amount of dots therefore leading to a bigger decline, but
Originally posted by tommy mac
Agents, whom have never been team owners can see a different side of GLB, maybe convincing them to stay instead of leaving like a lot have.
that is a valid point. :|
+1
Originally posted by tommy mac
Agents, whom have never been team owners can see a different side of GLB, maybe convincing them to stay instead of leaving like a lot have.
that is a valid point. :|
+1
Dub J
offline
offline
+1
I can't think of a time where there's ever been a demand for QBs, HBs, and returners (which is what most people use their free slot to create) so this suggestion actually would help out this game.
I can't think of a time where there's ever been a demand for QBs, HBs, and returners (which is what most people use their free slot to create) so this suggestion actually would help out this game.
sunder B
offline
offline
Originally posted by tommy mac
Agents, whom have never been team owners can see a different side of GLB, maybe convincing them to stay instead of leaving like a lot have.
Not buying this side of it. That's a reach IMO.
It is hard enough to fill the teams that are in the game now. How does creating more human owned teams solve this? All it does is thin out the free agent pool even more than it already is, and these new owners would simply get frustrated at their inability to field a team.
Agents, whom have never been team owners can see a different side of GLB, maybe convincing them to stay instead of leaving like a lot have.
Not buying this side of it. That's a reach IMO.
It is hard enough to fill the teams that are in the game now. How does creating more human owned teams solve this? All it does is thin out the free agent pool even more than it already is, and these new owners would simply get frustrated at their inability to field a team.
ClutchDreams
offline
offline
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
so ur asking for a free team? lolz
I think the first season is free then they gotta pay up.
Unless they wanna sell it and get another team or something.
so ur asking for a free team? lolz
I think the first season is free then they gotta pay up.
Unless they wanna sell it and get another team or something.
Diamond Spade
offline
offline
Originally posted by ClutchDreams
I think the first season is free then they gotta pay up.
Unless they wanna sell it and get another team or something.
thats worst then a free dot, who would want that?
thats stupid
I think the first season is free then they gotta pay up.
Unless they wanna sell it and get another team or something.
thats worst then a free dot, who would want that?
thats stupid
Maybe a better way of doing this..... Let the person choose which they want... A Free Dot or a Team.
I'm not sure this would change much here but it's a unique idea.
I'm not sure this would change much here but it's a unique idea.
Circus of Dead Squirrels
offline
offline
If we were dealing with a surplus of dots that could not find human owned teams, this would be a good idea.
Edited by Circus of Dead Squirrels on Apr 25, 2014 16:01:11
Edited by Circus of Dead Squirrels on Apr 25, 2014 15:59:10
Edited by Circus of Dead Squirrels on Apr 25, 2014 15:57:22
RiverRat2
offline
offline
We are short players not teams.
If you remove free players there will be a lot less players created.
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's/
Perhaps they can run D league teams. It will be the same experience.
If you remove free players there will be a lot less players created.
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's/
Perhaps they can run D league teams. It will be the same experience.
Originally posted by Circus of Dead Squirrels
If we were dealing with a surplus of dots that could not find human owned teams, this would be a good idea.
I support this quote.
If we were dealing with a surplus of dots that could not find human owned teams, this would be a good idea.
I support this quote.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by RiverRat2
We are short players not teams.
If you remove free players there will be a lot less players created.
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's/
Perhaps they can run D league teams. It will be the same experience.
There would be a lot less useless dots created. Every offseason we see the "omg why can't I create a free HB" threads.
We are short players not teams.
If you remove free players there will be a lot less players created.
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's/
Perhaps they can run D league teams. It will be the same experience.
There would be a lot less useless dots created. Every offseason we see the "omg why can't I create a free HB" threads.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by RiverRat2
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's
We are well beyond the point where CPU dots should be competitive.
What will they learn by running a team of CPU's
We are well beyond the point where CPU dots should be competitive.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
