Warrior General Games

are there still potential exploits to allowing this--or is this something that used to be a problem but isn't any longer since moving to age-based leagues?

would be nice if teams could control finances better and make small adjustments

Team jacks salaries for important game. Day after they negotiate down to minimum.


Exploit central

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Team jacks salaries for important game. Day after they negotiate down to minimum.


Exploit central

Well, since it takes the first 20 or so days of the season for salary changes to reach the full morale boost, I don't see how this could be an issue.

Originally posted by Dustin.
Well, since it takes the first 20 or so days of the season for salary changes to reach the full morale boost, I don't see how this could be an issue.

yeah, seems like most they'd get is about 0.5 bonus.

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Team jacks salaries for important game. Day after they negotiate down to minimum.


Exploit central

Couldn't this be countered by making salary markdowns cause negative morale?

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Couldn't this be countered by making salary markdowns cause negative morale?

I believe they do, I sent out lower paying contracts last offseason to my dots and they had -0.3 on the offers.

Originally posted by DeeVee8
I believe they do, I sent out lower paying contracts last offseason to my dots and they had -0.3 on the offers.

If that's the case and also;

Originally posted by Dustin.
Well, since it takes the first 20 or so days of the season for salary changes to reach the full morale boost, I don't see how this could be an issue.

if this is true as well, then perhaps the penalty could be increased (for lowering salaries). Both of these things would be a determent to teams trying to exploit the system... while also allowing the OP's suggestion to work for those who made mistakes with their finances.