Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses
or
having no strengths....
and no weaknesses.
or
having no strengths....
and no weaknesses.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > What's more important to the GLB community
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses.
This.
If you pick the right strengths, you can use them to overpower the other guy's weaknesses, and this whole game is built around maximizing your strengths. If you have no strengths to maximize, you're in trouble.
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses.
This.
If you pick the right strengths, you can use them to overpower the other guy's weaknesses, and this whole game is built around maximizing your strengths. If you have no strengths to maximize, you're in trouble.
Originally posted by Novus
This.
If you pick the right strengths, you can use them to overpower the other guy's weaknesses, and this whole game is built around maximizing your strengths. If you have no strengths to maximize, you're in trouble.
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point. Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
This.
If you pick the right strengths, you can use them to overpower the other guy's weaknesses, and this whole game is built around maximizing your strengths. If you have no strengths to maximize, you're in trouble.
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point. Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point.
But with no true strengths, you can't attack your opponent's weaknesses nearly as effectively.
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
Yes, without hesitation. Especially since there are often things I can do to mitigate my own weaknesses. And quite frankly, many of my opponents aren't clever enough or determined enough to identify my weaknesses in the first place, while others aren't strong enough to attack them effectively anyway. So in those scenarios, I effectively don't have any weaknesses at all... but I still have my strengths, and can use them fully.
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point.
But with no true strengths, you can't attack your opponent's weaknesses nearly as effectively.
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
Yes, without hesitation. Especially since there are often things I can do to mitigate my own weaknesses. And quite frankly, many of my opponents aren't clever enough or determined enough to identify my weaknesses in the first place, while others aren't strong enough to attack them effectively anyway. So in those scenarios, I effectively don't have any weaknesses at all... but I still have my strengths, and can use them fully.
Deathblade
offline
offline
and i cant help feel like this is a thread trying to promote slow players
slow players in fast positions cant exploit any weaknesses regardless of how "rounded" the rest of their build is
slow players in fast positions cant exploit any weaknesses regardless of how "rounded" the rest of their build is
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses
Powerbacks.
Originally posted by Deathblade
and i cant help feel like this is a thread trying to promote slow players
slow players in fast positions cant exploit any weaknesses regardless of how "rounded" the rest of their build is
Possession WRs.
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses
Powerbacks.
Originally posted by Deathblade
and i cant help feel like this is a thread trying to promote slow players
slow players in fast positions cant exploit any weaknesses regardless of how "rounded" the rest of their build is
Possession WRs.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by jampysos
Possession WRs.
I'm no guru in this area, but aren't most Possession WRs built with a fair amount of Speed? Certainly not as much as Speedster WRs, but still a lot? Coz it's hard to make the catch if you can't get any separation at all from the CB covering you.
Possession WRs.
I'm no guru in this area, but aren't most Possession WRs built with a fair amount of Speed? Certainly not as much as Speedster WRs, but still a lot? Coz it's hard to make the catch if you can't get any separation at all from the CB covering you.
Originally posted by Novus
I'm no guru in this area, but aren't most Possession WRs built with a fair amount of Speed? Certainly not as much as Speedster WRs, but still a lot? Coz it's hard to make the catch if you can't get any separation at all from the CB covering you.
130/130 is most popular,
Separation overrated imo, i see speedsters make 1on1 catches all day, only 90 catch ~2 catchpieces.
I'm no guru in this area, but aren't most Possession WRs built with a fair amount of Speed? Certainly not as much as Speedster WRs, but still a lot? Coz it's hard to make the catch if you can't get any separation at all from the CB covering you.
130/130 is most popular,
Separation overrated imo, i see speedsters make 1on1 catches all day, only 90 catch ~2 catchpieces.
Phantom Of The Opera
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachingubigr
Bumping the Dee Jackson thread in game recaps every couple of days
because you are so pathetic that this is an avenue you use to make yourself feel better about yourself.
Bumping the Dee Jackson thread in game recaps every couple of days
because you are so pathetic that this is an avenue you use to make yourself feel better about yourself.
FBfan4life
offline
offline
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point. Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
It has always been my opinion that if you try to have balanced dots - In the end they stink.
Best dots specialize it what they want to do and build everything to accentuate that.
i.e.
You want a speed catch fake dot, build everything to capitalize on that
You want an INT dot then it all should be focused to that.
So on and so forth.
Try to build a dot that could do some of this and then some of that along with some of that and maybe throw in a little of that, but then you could also get this to do some of that. While you think - Everything is covered - In the end you leave disappointed cause the dot just doesn't cut it.
Having no strengths isn't to be taken at face value though... the strength of balance is being able to attack any weakness your opponent has, which goes along with your first point. Do you still choose option 1? And accept a limited arsenal and weaknesses that are exploitable by option 2?
It has always been my opinion that if you try to have balanced dots - In the end they stink.
Best dots specialize it what they want to do and build everything to accentuate that.
i.e.
You want a speed catch fake dot, build everything to capitalize on that
You want an INT dot then it all should be focused to that.
So on and so forth.
Try to build a dot that could do some of this and then some of that along with some of that and maybe throw in a little of that, but then you could also get this to do some of that. While you think - Everything is covered - In the end you leave disappointed cause the dot just doesn't cut it.
Sellars
offline
offline
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses
or
having no strengths....
and no weaknesses.
Most important of all is not having an avi that looks like yours. That is #1
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses
or
having no strengths....
and no weaknesses.
Most important of all is not having an avi that looks like yours. That is #1
Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
because you are so pathetic that this is an avenue you use to make yourself feel better about yourself.
No u
because you are so pathetic that this is an avenue you use to make yourself feel better about yourself.
No u
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
