Have some sort of timer to create a player. For example if someone wants to create a player on Day 40 but for some reason that individual was busy that week and misses that window.
.
.
Forum > Suggestions > Set Player Creation date option
BadgerPhil
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tribal Warfare
Have some sort of timer to create a player. For example if someone wants to create a player on Day 40 but for some reason that individual was busy that week and misses that window.
.
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
Have some sort of timer to create a player. For example if someone wants to create a player on Day 40 but for some reason that individual was busy that week and misses that window.
.
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
Edited by BadgerPhil on Mar 24, 2013 16:09:54
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
Tribal Warfare
offline
offline
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
The idea is based off the autotraining method, if there is a set option like that it would be advantageous for individuals who get intensely busy certain weeks or months to have that available.
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
The idea is based off the autotraining method, if there is a set option like that it would be advantageous for individuals who get intensely busy certain weeks or months to have that available.
Novus
offline
offline
Probably not gonna happen. Bort prefers you to have to log in to do stuff. More page views and all that, which helps him later whenever he decides to A.) sell the game, or B.) sell advertising.
BadgerPhil
offline
offline
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
Have a good time?
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
Have a good time?
BadgerPhil
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tribal Warfare
The idea is based off the autotraining method, if there is a set option like that it would be advantageous for individuals who get intensely busy certain weeks or months to have that available.
Oh, misread the suggestion then. Not a bad idea. Queue it up early have it execute on a certain day. I'd +1 that.
The idea is based off the autotraining method, if there is a set option like that it would be advantageous for individuals who get intensely busy certain weeks or months to have that available.
Oh, misread the suggestion then. Not a bad idea. Queue it up early have it execute on a certain day. I'd +1 that.
Edited by BadgerPhil on Mar 24, 2013 18:45:33
BadgerPhil
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Probably not gonna happen. Bort prefers you to have to log in to do stuff. More page views and all that, which helps him later whenever he decides to A.) sell the game, or B.) sell advertising.
Yeah, while this is true, I think just queuing a player's creation and not the go-foward build might actually increase site visits. Due to the fact it makes hitting sweet spot for build dates easier.
Probably not gonna happen. Bort prefers you to have to log in to do stuff. More page views and all that, which helps him later whenever he decides to A.) sell the game, or B.) sell advertising.
Yeah, while this is true, I think just queuing a player's creation and not the go-foward build might actually increase site visits. Due to the fact it makes hitting sweet spot for build dates easier.
Edited by BadgerPhil on Mar 24, 2013 19:00:46
In theory this would be a decent idea. but as we all know there would be someone screw up. and then run in here bitching and moaning about how GLB screwed them out of flex or something similar. the idea opens up the potential for alot of mistakes and in turn alot of headaches. if the suggestion was fool proof I would +1 it because I build a ton of dots. but I just think it would be more headache than it would be worth.
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
you gonna have Bort boost and apply SP for them too?
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Would, say Day 40 through 48 be enough? In those 8 days you can essential build the same dot with no loss of training ability. So essentially a Dot built on Day 41-48 would look the same as a Dot build on Day 40.
what if youre on vacation for 2 weeks?
you gonna have Bort boost and apply SP for them too?
Tribal Warfare
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
In theory this would be a decent idea. but as we all know there would be someone screw up. and then run in here bitching and moaning about how GLB screwed them out of flex or something similar. the idea opens up the potential for alot of mistakes and in turn alot of headaches. if the suggestion was fool proof I would +1 it because I build a ton of dots. but I just think it would be more headache than it would be worth.
It's there choice to use the option, they don't have to if it's a bother.
In theory this would be a decent idea. but as we all know there would be someone screw up. and then run in here bitching and moaning about how GLB screwed them out of flex or something similar. the idea opens up the potential for alot of mistakes and in turn alot of headaches. if the suggestion was fool proof I would +1 it because I build a ton of dots. but I just think it would be more headache than it would be worth.
It's there choice to use the option, they don't have to if it's a bother.
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Probably not gonna happen. Bort prefers you to have to log in to do stuff. More page views and all that, which helps him later whenever he decides to A.) sell the game, or B.) sell advertising.
Pretty sure neither will happen.
It's just better to have a game that you "play" rather than a game that "plays".
Probably not gonna happen. Bort prefers you to have to log in to do stuff. More page views and all that, which helps him later whenever he decides to A.) sell the game, or B.) sell advertising.
Pretty sure neither will happen.
It's just better to have a game that you "play" rather than a game that "plays".
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tribal Warfare
It's there choice to use the option, they don't have to if it's a bother.
their
you even bolded it
It's there choice to use the option, they don't have to if it's a bother.
their
you even bolded it
Tribal Warfare
offline
offline
Originally posted by Deathblade
their
you even bolded it
wrote that before I went to bed, so I forgot to reread and edit.
their
you even bolded it
wrote that before I went to bed, so I forgot to reread and edit.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
