Seriously... is this just not an easy implementation, or is there some underlying reservation in having this option that the "OWNER" can give to the "CO-OWNER"??
Allow "OWNER" to give GM assigning privileges to "CO-OWNER"
Simple... and yes I know it is up for voting, but gee willickers (is that how you spell willicker?)
Allow "OWNER" to give GM assigning privileges to "CO-OWNER"
Simple... and yes I know it is up for voting, but gee willickers (is that how you spell willicker?)
