Warrior General Games

So when a player has never been in the pro leagues, dodging them their entire career, at what point can we call the HOF rankings broken and in need of repair?

To add to it, they should separate the retired from active players

They should separate the early dots from the modern dots imo.

Actually a decent idea

Originally posted by CyberNinja
To add to it, they should separate the retired from active players

Originally posted by Dub J
They should separate the early dots from the modern dots imo.

Should have tried to get this in before the end of Beta. Sadly, there wasn't enough time.

WL play ought to be worth double or triple Nat Pro play, and nothing below Pro ought to give any HoF status (or ought to be worth 10-20% of Nat Pro at best).

Not sure how you go about fixing the OG playahs from the modern guys, maybe establish the Season 18 guys as the beginning of "modern era?" (or whenever the first gen of extended plateau guys hit level 79).

should we make more pro leagues?

Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
should we make more pro leagues?

We could try expanding it to 8 leagues, with the top 2 teams from each feeding WL.

private forum HOF's are the only HOF's that matter...since I have a dot in one, I am sticking to that statement.

Originally posted by tautology
We could try expanding it to 8 leagues, with the top 2 teams from each feeding WL.



best suggestion ever

We should put a star next to some HOF players' names, starting with any made with the re-roller script (when and if they get there).

The only person that takes the HOF seriously is Dpride

Originally posted by CyberNinja
To add to it, they should separate the retired from active players

Originally posted by Dub J
They should separate the early dots from the modern dots imo.

Really there just need to be more viewable subsets in general.