Warrior General Games

Why is training progress maintained in a separate system from the actual attribute values?

Example: Say I have an attribute with a value of 40 with a training progress of 0%. In the current system, I train the attribute to say 40% of the training progress. Assuming the next training session gets me an additional 40%, it takes 3 sessions to get 1 attribute point with 20% in training progress. Instead of this, can we have a system that gets me 40.4 in the attribute value right after the first training session (40.8 after the second and 41.2 after the third) and eliminate training progress?

I'm almost positive that this has been suggested before, just can't find any posts related to it.

It has in some form.

It would remove some of the frustration from the system. It might remove some of the finessing as well but the game has enough challenges that I do not think it would suffer from this.

+1

Move to Epic. Get this voted on and implement ASAP.

Originally posted by daryls61
Move to Epic. Get this voted on and implement ASAP.

THIS!!

Has been suggested many times over many seasons. The fact that it is not like that currently probably means NGTH

Isn't this the training way at season 2~3?

Originally posted by aaasahi
Isn't this the training way at season 2~3?


Wow...my Way-Back Machine only gets me to season 7.

Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Has been suggested many times over many seasons. The fact that it is not like that currently probably means NGTH

Then why have a suggestions forum? If its NGTH, then at least the "powers-that-be" (or developers..) should explain the reasons? If the can't do that, then this forum is useless.

Training used to be like this. I believe this change was made in part to keep things a little simpler (or maybe so we have fewer decimals).

Originally posted by bigtisme
Training used to be like this. I believe this change was made in part to keep things a little simpler (or maybe so we have fewer decimals).

Fewer decimals ftw

this seems like a logical decision and should be implemented IMO...

+1 from me.

The current system does add to build planning.

You need to keep track of where you are in the train progress and switch whenever appropriate so that you don't get stuck with one attribute at 98% with no more chances to train.

This, in my humble opinion, adds to the difference between a good dot builder and a not so good one.

-1

-1