User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Link
 
If you want to make a HB, you would have to purchase flex, I understand a lot of people want to make HB's, but if you ask me you should be able to use your free player for a HB. Why can't you?
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Because then we end up in the same mess that we see with QBs.

QBs struggle even to find CPU homes.
 
BagO'Chips
offline
Link
 
If you're going to make one of these positions (QB, HB) have a team lined up for them.
 
Achelon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MikelDenslow24
If you want to make a HB, you would have to purchase flex, I understand a lot of people want to make HB's, but if you ask me you should be able to use your free player for a HB. Why can't you?


Originally posted by MikelDenslow24
a lot of people want to make HB's
 
XtremeT13
offline
Link
 
From what I understand it's because the large amount of HB's that are built is flooding the game to a point where there are not enough teams and such. Remember GLB survives off our money. And if everyone is using there 1 or 2 free players to only build QB's, HB's and WR's then less and less flex will be needed to create dots and thus, the game will not make money....which means...bye bye GLB.
 
dahman32
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by XtremeT13
From what I understand it's because the large amount of HB's that are built is flooding the game to a point where there are not enough teams and such. Remember GLB survives off our money. And if everyone is using there 1 or 2 free players to only build QB's, HB's and WR's then less and less flex will be needed to create dots and thus, the game will not make money....which means...bye bye GLB.


But the crazy thing is that you can still create an HB, even though the claims of "same mess"

If it is a mess, why not just hold to a firm line and prevent the creation of these positions if there are already too many.
But no, instead it goes this way (if you want to pay for it, go ahead and add to the mess)

The mess is not created because of "free players" being used at this position, so there must be some other reason...

Originally posted by MikelDenslow24
If you want to make a HB, you would have to purchase flex, I understand a lot of people want to make HB's, but if you ask me you should be able to use your free player for a HB. Why can't you?



$$$

 
XtremeT13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dahman32

$$$



Yes, you can still create HB's if you use flex... but, that's where the money aspect plays a role.
 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by XtremeT13
Yes, you can still create HB's if you use flex... but, that's where the money aspect plays a role.


its a business...
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
I don't understand why anyone would want to create a player there is no market for anyway. Your best bet is to create a CB or safety. They get stats and they are cheaper than QBs and HBs.
 
XtremeT13
offline
Link
 
Everyone wants to have a glamor guy... they want that special feeling of having a WR or QB
 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by XtremeT13
Everyone wants to have a glamor guy... they want that special feeling of having a WR or QB


and everyone can.
 
XtremeT13
offline
Link
 
unfortunately for all those everyone's that can and do... a team cannot be made up of all and only these positions. So, good luck finding quality teams or getting playing time on a crap team.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Yeah, frankly I would have no problem with free players not being allowed at HB / QB.
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Yeah, frankly I would have no problem with free players not being allowed at HB / QB.


 
TheBear
Roll Tide
offline
Link
 
WR is the best position to use the free players for. They cost way too much for the stats they get.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.