Pretty self explanatory. I am not asking for any change to when we are allowed to go for 2. I just want to be able to pick the play we use to go for 2. Should be easy enough to implement with minimal exploit potential.
Forum > Suggestions > Allow us to Pick our 2 Pt Conversion Play/s
Dub J
offline
offline
Only way I could possibly go for this is if there are limitations to the formations used and the defense could use custom plays against it. It's just too damn easy to get a couple of yards.
Guppy, Inc
online
online
inside the 2, there are a few plays that are unstoppable. once those are found by everyone, might as well just give the team the 2 pts w/o running the play. in theory, +1, but in reality, -1.
dahman32
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
no
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
no
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by dahman32
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
The run up the middle would be an easy 2 points imo.
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
The run up the middle would be an easy 2 points imo.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by dahman32
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
How the hell is allowing us to pick what play we want to run on a 2 pt. conversion "spicing up the game"?
You do realize that if this were implemented Bort should just go ahead and code it so any time you are in a 2 pt. situation the offense is just handed the 2 points?
Yeah, boy howdy. Everyone figuring out which inside run gets you an automatic 2 pt. conversion every time you attempt it and everyone using that exact same play is really exciting.
Ditto
2pt conversion should always be a run up the middle, no additives.
Why would anyone want to spice up this game??
Simply outrageous... boring and inconsistent is the way to go
(not to mention the moving yellow 1st down marker, darn gremlins on the field)
How the hell is allowing us to pick what play we want to run on a 2 pt. conversion "spicing up the game"?
You do realize that if this were implemented Bort should just go ahead and code it so any time you are in a 2 pt. situation the offense is just handed the 2 points?
Yeah, boy howdy. Everyone figuring out which inside run gets you an automatic 2 pt. conversion every time you attempt it and everyone using that exact same play is really exciting.
Gerr
offline
offline
I like the idea of giving us more flexibility on what plays to call for the 2 point conversion. But Dub is right in that it's too easy to just pick up 2 yards, so something would need to be put into place so it's still a decent risk to go for 2.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
