What is avoid fake chance and is it useful for WRs?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Avoid Fake Chance
Hagalaz
offline
offline
Avoid fake is useless for a WR. It only helps defenders not be faked by the offense. Fakes are jukes, pump fakes, head fakes...
kwankwan
offline
offline
Would be if CBs had something like a Deflect Fake SA....
This player can make a quick fake with his hands while in man coverage, pretending to deflect a pass. Receivers running a route can be fooled by this, and may fall down or attempt a diving catch.
SIm would be better off imo...
This player can make a quick fake with his hands while in man coverage, pretending to deflect a pass. Receivers running a route can be fooled by this, and may fall down or attempt a diving catch.
SIm would be better off imo...
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by kwankwan
Would be if CBs had something like a Deflect Fake SA....
This player can make a quick fake with his hands while in man coverage, pretending to deflect a pass. Receivers running a route can be fooled by this, and may fall down or attempt a diving catch.
SIm would be better off imo...
Has nothing to do with the OP's question though. Perhaps make a suggestion versus using scenarios that don't currently exist.
OP's question has been answered. Should lock this thread now.
Would be if CBs had something like a Deflect Fake SA....
This player can make a quick fake with his hands while in man coverage, pretending to deflect a pass. Receivers running a route can be fooled by this, and may fall down or attempt a diving catch.
SIm would be better off imo...
Has nothing to do with the OP's question though. Perhaps make a suggestion versus using scenarios that don't currently exist.
OP's question has been answered. Should lock this thread now.
Golan
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
Has nothing to do with the OP's question though. Perhaps make a suggestion versus using scenarios that don't currently exist.
Yes he was clearly being serious.
Has nothing to do with the OP's question though. Perhaps make a suggestion versus using scenarios that don't currently exist.
Yes he was clearly being serious.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by Golan
Yes he was clearly being serious.
We don't want non serious answers in the FAQ's section for new people to learn. There are plenty of forums to not be serious.
This thread has served its purpose.....please lock.
Yes he was clearly being serious.
We don't want non serious answers in the FAQ's section for new people to learn. There are plenty of forums to not be serious.
This thread has served its purpose.....please lock.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
This thread has served its purpose.....please lock.
Stop backseat moderating.
This thread has served its purpose.....please lock.
Stop backseat moderating.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Stop backseat moderating.
Please stop moderating my moderating
Stop backseat moderating.
Please stop moderating my moderating
jdbolick
offline
offline
Between this and you blowing up on that newbie because dared to ask about training without checking other threads first, it's pretty clear that you need to take some time away from the FAQ forum. Come back when you can post without trying to act like an authority figure.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Between this and you blowing up on that newbie because dared to ask about training without checking other threads first, it's pretty clear that you need to take some time away from the FAQ forum. Come back when you can post without trying to act like an authority figure.
1) I apologized to that newbie and he accepted my apology.
2) You blow up on people all the time and down right degrade them
3) You seem to have an issue with me asking threads to be locked after an OP's question has been answered.
3a) I have been guilty (like now) of drawing threads out which makes it harder for a new person to find the answer they are looking for. They shouldn't have to read 30 posts when 1 post answered their question. I am trying to put a stop to that so we can clean up the FAQ's and make it easier for new agents to find the answers they seek.
Not trying to argue or debate or battle you jd. I am not the enemy.
Between this and you blowing up on that newbie because dared to ask about training without checking other threads first, it's pretty clear that you need to take some time away from the FAQ forum. Come back when you can post without trying to act like an authority figure.
1) I apologized to that newbie and he accepted my apology.
2) You blow up on people all the time and down right degrade them
3) You seem to have an issue with me asking threads to be locked after an OP's question has been answered.
3a) I have been guilty (like now) of drawing threads out which makes it harder for a new person to find the answer they are looking for. They shouldn't have to read 30 posts when 1 post answered their question. I am trying to put a stop to that so we can clean up the FAQ's and make it easier for new agents to find the answers they seek.
Not trying to argue or debate or battle you jd. I am not the enemy.
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 12, 2012 17:50:48
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 12, 2012 17:50:01
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
2) You blow up on people all the time and down right degrade them
People like you, because you deserve it. I don't ever, ever criticize new people for asking a question. That's what this forum is for, no matter how many times their question has been asked before.
Originally posted by
3) You seem to have an issue with me asking threads to be locked after an OP's question has been answered.
Yes, because that's unnecessary and it's not your place to do so. Maybe the OP will have another question, or maybe someone else will read the thread and have a question or comment of their own. It's been pretty clear lately that you view the FAQ forum as a place for you to gain some relevance, which is fine if you stick to the basics. Jumping down a newbie's throat and declaring when threads need to be locked is beyond your purview, so knock it off already.
2) You blow up on people all the time and down right degrade them
People like you, because you deserve it. I don't ever, ever criticize new people for asking a question. That's what this forum is for, no matter how many times their question has been asked before.
Originally posted by
3) You seem to have an issue with me asking threads to be locked after an OP's question has been answered.
Yes, because that's unnecessary and it's not your place to do so. Maybe the OP will have another question, or maybe someone else will read the thread and have a question or comment of their own. It's been pretty clear lately that you view the FAQ forum as a place for you to gain some relevance, which is fine if you stick to the basics. Jumping down a newbie's throat and declaring when threads need to be locked is beyond your purview, so knock it off already.
whodey08
offline
offline
I got mad at 1 person for asking a question that has been asked a dozen times and I apologized for it and he accepted it. I don't see how that makes me deserving to be blown up on and degraded. You tell people to stop posting in these forums when you deem them to be wrong and you call them idiots and foolish and so on.
Your an online bully who happens to have some knowledge of this game. Get over yourself.
Your an online bully who happens to have some knowledge of this game. Get over yourself.
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 12, 2012 18:12:14
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
It's been pretty clear lately that you view the FAQ forum as a place for you to gain some relevance,
It's been pretty clear lately that you view the FAQ forum as a place for you to gain some relevance,
whodey08
offline
offline
I have no idea what your response is gonna be and don't care. I am not being dragged down to your level anymore. Have a good day.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
