Warrior General Games

I do not know if this has been brought up. If it hasnt I would be surprised. There needs to be limits on attributes based on the players size. No fing player weighing 270+ lbs is going to be able to track down a guy who is 5'8" 175lbs. Or let me refraze that. catch him in the open field.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2050872&pbp_id=8928340

That is the play example. There is 3 C's and a FS running at the Punt Return Man. 121 spd, 79 agi, 63 vision. There is no way 3 fat arse lineman should be anywhere near this return man. Its just not logical. One of the C's makes the takle. 6'3" 270lbs. If the PR guy didnt have the entire right side of the field open I could maybe go with they had the angle. That isnt the case. They are basically running right at him. People get olineman because they cost 100 flex and just speed train them. that is bull. Sorry not logical. For guys with alot of weight to run as fast as a HB, WR, CB

So the point is. There needs to be caps on certain attributes so that fat asses do not have the same speed as skilled positions. Its just doesnt make sense.

...............
No, thanks.

-1 your pr ran into them.

and what is your resoning?
O_o

No its a BS mistake in the game. Sorry Big guys should not be able to get their speed anywhere near the same as skilled positions. And I know why people are opposed to this. Because Lineman cost 100 flex. so they can make alot of ST players out of them. That just isnt logical.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
-1 your pr ran into them.

there is no way they should have even been that close to him. 3 C's were running as fast as a FS. You find that logical? Really? And again its not really about the PR's path choice. Its the fact that 3 fat asses are running at the speed of a FS.

Originally posted by simmjer
there is no way they should have even been that close to him. 3 C's were running as fast as a FS. You find that logical? Really? And again its not really about the PR's path choice. Its the fact that 3 fat asses are running at the speed of a FS.

you do realize a lot of linemen run a 40 in 5 seconds or less right? a FS might be .7 seconds faster. so no this isnt illogical.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
Originally posted by simmjer

there is no way they should have even been that close to him. 3 C's were running as fast as a FS. You find that logical? Really? And again its not really about the PR's path choice. Its the fact that 3 fat asses are running at the speed of a FS.

you do realize a lot of linemen run a 40 in 5 seconds or less right? a FS might be .7 seconds faster. so no this isnt illogical.

Ok my quick find was the top 10 OLine in 2011 draft avg of top 10 was 5.09. Avg same year DB's top 10 4.42. so approx .7 diff. So that is a huge difference when your talking about speed. almost a second faster. But again. how many lineman can shed a block and still keep up with the speed of a skilled position. so not its not logical. Your right.

your just one of the cheaters who likes to use ST lineman on their squad. (already checked). Any game like this wether it be this or lets say consoul games they always try to make it as realistic as possible. So going that route. No lineman has the same speed as a skilled position player. PERIOD.

if people want to make ST's players they need to be made out of Lbers, CB's, WR's, TE's, Longsnappers.

How many lineman are used on Kick off teams or even punt teams for that matter compared to players that are not lineman. The number is very very small. if hardly any.

+1

Its hard to find out proof of St's depth charts ie. kick off teams or punt team. But here is a video. stop it at :12 (right at the begining. You can see down the line of the pittsburgh steelers (I hate saying this 6 time SB champs) Wait a second. do you see any fat ass lineman in that line?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7iImLtDFOc

Originally posted by Dub J
+1

Thanks Dub

There already is a penalty regarding weight/speed but it's obviously not enough.

Originally posted by simmjer
Ok my quick find was the top 10 OLine in 2011 draft avg of top 10 was 5.09. Avg same year DB's top 10 4.42. so approx .7 diff. So that is a huge difference when your talking about speed. almost a second faster. But again. how many lineman can shed a block and still keep up with the speed of a skilled position. so not its not logical. Your right.

your just one of the cheaters who likes to use ST lineman on their squad. (already checked). Any game like this wether it be this or lets say consoul games they always try to make it as realistic as possible. So going that route. No lineman has the same speed as a skilled position player. PERIOD.

the replay you put up, the linemen got around everyone ran down field and the FS got blocked then caught up to the ST centres.


so i have no idea what youre rambling on about.

Originally posted by simmjer
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop

Originally posted by simmjer


there is no way they should have even been that close to him. 3 C's were running as fast as a FS. You find that logical? Really? And again its not really about the PR's path choice. Its the fact that 3 fat asses are running at the speed of a FS.

you do realize a lot of linemen run a 40 in 5 seconds or less right? a FS might be .7 seconds faster. so no this isnt illogical.

Ok my quick find was the top 10 OLine in 2011 draft avg of top 10 was 5.09. Avg same year DB's top 10 4.42. so approx .7 diff. So that is a huge difference when your talking about speed. almost a second faster. But again. how many lineman can shed a block and still keep up with the speed of a skilled position. so not its not logical. Your right.

your just one of the cheaters who likes to use ST lineman on their squad. (already checked). Any game like this wether it be this or lets say consoul games they always try to make it as realistic as possible. So going that route. No lineman has the same speed as a skilled position player. PERIOD.

of course, if the skill player does not have up to his speed he wants, is highly drained stamina...well, he can still be caught.