User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Rate my Player > HB level 79 build lost its way
Page:
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
I don't even remember what the Player was supposed to look like. He was boss until the accelerated player development change over. (Boss because he rolled all gear needed and was gonna be able to multi train til forever.) Then I was able to make my other HB even better due to crappy EQ that was picked up waiting for a direction, with the whole sell and re-roll EQ debacle, causing a flip flop in cares.

Anyway shoot holes in this build if you will.
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Uh yeah a link would be good.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1995991
 
Ubasstards
offline
Link
 
looks OK but is a scat HB built as an elusive HB. Would have been better with those ALGs in vision
 
KCChiefsMan
offline
Link
 
scat backs need 80 catching as there is no difference at all in 30 - 70 catching.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
scat backs need 80 catching as there is no difference at all in 30 - 70 catching.


Really? Wow.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
Uh yeah a link would be good.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1995991


I'd sign him to my team.

In fact, whats he doing on Day 42?

Any dot named Tatanka is good by me.

As for build, WTF do I know but jumping 20s and confidence both seem low? Vision too as noted.

But with 166 speed lol who cares he must get alot of TD break aways.
 
tautology
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan

scat backs need 80 catching as there is no difference at all in 30 - 70 catching.


Really? Wow.


It's an exaggeration, but not as much of an exaggeration as you might think.


The sim ran away from builds like this, which were pretty good about 5 seasons ago.

It's still a quality dot though, might look good if outside running gets easier or if screens make a comeback.



 
cymaddux31
offline
Link
 
would like to see the scat back ability, other than that looks good.
 
cymaddux31
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
scat backs need 80 catching as there is no difference at all in 30 - 70 catching.


 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
He's going to the big Glue factory in cyberspace.
 
KCChiefsMan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by cymaddux31


a little exaggerated but not by much. You only need 30 catching to catch screens and with 50- 70 catching you aren't gonna catch too many passes downfield unless you are wide open, with 70 you will catch some but would be unreliable, but with 80 you will catch a good enough amount.
 
JimForce
offline
Link
 
Maybe the drinking caught up to him.
 
IIAMLEGEND
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
a little exaggerated but not by much. You only need 30 catching to catch screens and with 50- 70 catching you aren't gonna catch too many passes downfield unless you are wide open, with 70 you will catch some but would be unreliable, but with 80 you will catch a good enough amount.


you need at least 48 catching to not be a liability from my experience, but thats at top leauges, ive seen my guy with 48 pull in passes just as crazy as everyone else whose primary job is to catch the ball.
 
KCChiefsMan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by IIAMLEGEND
you need at least 48 catching to not be a liability from my experience, but thats at top leauges, ive seen my guy with 48 pull in passes just as crazy as everyone else whose primary job is to catch the ball.


show me a replay of a HB with 48 catching, catching anything other than a screen with any sort of coverage nearby.
 
tautology
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
show me a replay of a HB with 48 catching, catching anything other than a screen with any sort of coverage nearby.


Here are a couple from the SAPL championship game:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2001055&pbp_id=10479885
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2001055&pbp_id=10481269

They happen more often than you think (most folks don't bother to try them of course).
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.