Warrior General Games

If at all possible, I am sure 90% of pee wee owners and agents would vote to do away with them. The levels from 1-16 have poor every attribute imaginable that penalties can and will decide games.

They are random (I've tried many build plans and they happen no matter what)
They serve no purpose. Started in season 1 and we didn't have them then. We don't need randomness destroying competitive games.
They change games where teams are evenly matched. You can be driving and get hit with 2 to 3 in a row. I had one game where I had 5 in 6 plays.
Also say you want to put a solid running game together. Your driving and then get hit with a false start. Happens everytime. That just killed the running game now forcing a running team to pass.

I ask they be removed from pee wee leagues if possible.

+1 great suggestion

+1

I agree 100% especially since I do enjoy the run game and have been destroyed by penalties on 3rd or 4th and shorts.

"But, but... if you don't penalize them when they make mistakes, how will they ever learn to...?"

...he began to type, before realizing the utter ridiculousness of the line of thought.

+1

I would support removing penalties from every level of the game, but as a 3 team pee wee owner, I especially support removing them from pee wee.

The reason: We don't have injuries because they would be too random and would specifically hurt too many people and discourage them, right?...............well that's exactly what penalties do, imo.......especially in pee wee.

Penalties are very random, and a lot of times, tend to come at a crucial time in the game,
At least if we had a skill to train that we were told would specifically cut down on penalties, but we don't.....so its tough that its such a random thing, and can kill the end of a game......
and the people it specifically hurts? The coaches and coordinators of the offending team. Sucks sometimes to work so hard on a gameplan, just to lose a game because your oline suddenly committed 9 false starts that all were on late downs with short yards lol.

In pee wee in particular, it does seem that there are more of these random calls that can kill a team or a game......I think it would be awesome if we had a chance to play some pee wee games, without penalties, and see what happens.

Plus, its not realistic anyways.....all we have is false starts, right? I know ive seen my QB roughed up plenty of times, but no flag there Interference, nope If we cant have the rest because its too random to put in, then we should take out the false starts, because they are just as random.

Put it up for a vote

+1

-1

+1

+1

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
-1

you obviously don't play pee wee, so can you share your reasoning for this?

Originally posted by NewEnglandPatriots51
+1

I would support removing penalties from every level of the game, but as a 3 team pee wee owner, I especially support removing them from pee wee.

The reason: We don't have injuries because they would be too random and would specifically hurt too many people and discourage them, right?...............well that's exactly what penalties do, imo.......especially in pee wee.

Penalties are very random, and a lot of times, tend to come at a crucial time in the game,
At least if we had a skill to train that we were told would specifically cut down on penalties, but we don't.....so its tough that its such a random thing, and can kill the end of a game......
and the people it specifically hurts? The coaches and coordinators of the offending team. Sucks sometimes to work so hard on a gameplan, just to lose a game because your oline suddenly committed 9 false starts that all were on late downs with short yards lol.

In pee wee in particular, it does seem that there are more of these random calls that can kill a team or a game......I think it would be awesome if we had a chance to play some pee wee games, without penalties, and see what happens.

Plus, its not realistic anyways.....all we have is false starts, right? I know ive seen my QB roughed up plenty of times, but no flag there Interference, nope If we cant have the rest because its too random to put in, then we should take out the false starts, because they are just as random.

Put it up for a vote

+1

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
-1

yes please give a counterargument to the suggestion

+1