Warrior General Games

i understand why so many think that shopping is a waste of time. shopping is such a huge crap shoot, especially for STOPs. you can go on many many trips w/o getting anything close to what you are looking for. then, POOF, there they are, not one but two perfect pieces of aeq. but currently, we can only buy 1 or the other. just so that there is some pain involved, after buying the 1st piece, the remaining prices go up 25%, then if you buy it, then the remaining pieces go up another 25%, etc.

theoretically, the coding should be simple. instead of resetting the shopping when a piece is bought, just remove the purchased piece and raise the remaining prices by 25%.

yeah shopping for stop OL is a horrible idea. The way they have it set up sucks for them.

+1 but I doubt it will get implemented.

I'd be ok with it, but as mentioned, it's probably working for GLB in terms of cost vs benefit. By allowing you to buy 2 or more pieces that show up it potentially reduces the cost to shop.

+1, i'd even go so far as to say you can buy anything that is there, even if you get lucky and get 4 useful items in one roll.

Originally posted by alindyl
+1, i'd even go so far as to say you can buy anything that is there, even if you get lucky and get 4 useful items in one roll.

I could live with this.

+1

Originally posted by alindyl
I'd be ok with it, but as mentioned, it's probably working for GLB in terms of cost vs benefit. By allowing you to buy 2 or more pieces that show up it potentially reduces the cost to shop.

+1, i'd even go so far as to say you can buy anything that is there, even if you get lucky and get 4 useful items in one roll.

yeah, my example only mentioned buying 2, but the items would all stay there at the 25% increase until you go shopping again. my coding example was meant to cover that. so if you started with 6 items, buy 1, the remaining 5 would go up 25%, then if you buy another, the remaining 4 would go up another 25%, and so on.

you could even raise the 25% to 50% instead if it was deemed that 25% would be too low.

+1, and a 25% price hike for the second piece of equipment sounds like enough imo.