We have Auto Training, why not have Auto Vet Point Distribution? Seems to make logical sense.
Forum > Suggestions > Auto Vet Point Distribution
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Inorite
+1
Edit: Even guys with 30 dots want this. F'ing do it already.
Inorite
+1
Edit: Even guys with 30 dots want this. F'ing do it already.
spartan822
offline
offline
+1
Would be especially useful if I have dots on a team that plays its games really early in the morning. There's no way I'm waking up at 6am just to get some VPs applied in time for a game.
Would be especially useful if I have dots on a team that plays its games really early in the morning. There's no way I'm waking up at 6am just to get some VPs applied in time for a game.
Edited by spartan822 on Jan 30, 2012 08:55:59
Kirghiz
offline
offline
I am retiring 50 dots and selling two teams at the end of the season because I no longer have time to maintain them all, not because I can't afford them. APD is a double edged sword. It makes the game more interesting for those with fewer dots, but the ones that have and will continue to spend a ton of money here are becoming strained by the amount of work maintaining 150+ dots is. I know several people that keep a ton of dots that are in this boat and contemplating trimming down. GLB might see more $20-$50 flex purchases every season from the people with 25 dots, but if the big builders trim back because of time, the $275, $500, and $1000 purchases will slow down dramatically.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
Clarka3
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kirghiz
I am retiring 50 dots and selling two teams at the end of the season because I no longer have time to maintain them all, not because I can't afford them. APD is a double edged sword. It makes the game more interesting for those with fewer dots, but the ones that have and will continue to spend a ton of money here are becoming strained by the amount of work maintaining 150+ dots is. I know several people that keep a ton of dots that are in this boat and contemplating trimming down. GLB might see more $20-$50 flex purchases every season from the people with 25 dots, but if the big builders trim back because of time, the $275, $500, and $1000 purchases will slow down dramatically.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
agreed.
I am retiring 50 dots and selling two teams at the end of the season because I no longer have time to maintain them all, not because I can't afford them. APD is a double edged sword. It makes the game more interesting for those with fewer dots, but the ones that have and will continue to spend a ton of money here are becoming strained by the amount of work maintaining 150+ dots is. I know several people that keep a ton of dots that are in this boat and contemplating trimming down. GLB might see more $20-$50 flex purchases every season from the people with 25 dots, but if the big builders trim back because of time, the $275, $500, and $1000 purchases will slow down dramatically.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
agreed.
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Inorite
+1
Edit: Even guys with 30 dots want this. F'ing do it already.
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Inorite
+1
Edit: Even guys with 30 dots want this. F'ing do it already.
Originally posted by Kirghiz
I am retiring 50 dots and selling two teams at the end of the season because I no longer have time to maintain them all, not because I can't afford them. APD is a double edged sword. It makes the game more interesting for those with fewer dots, but the ones that have and will continue to spend a ton of money here are becoming strained by the amount of work maintaining 150+ dots is. I know several people that keep a ton of dots that are in this boat and contemplating trimming down. GLB might see more $20-$50 flex purchases every season from the people with 25 dots, but if the big builders trim back because of time, the $275, $500, and $1000 purchases will slow down dramatically.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
I call it the Zen of Dot Maintenance, mindless clicking is kinda relaxing if you do it cross legged naked while humming "ohmmmmm".
I am an advocate of more things to do with your dot, more choices and strategies.
But once the choice is made having to come back and implement it in fiften multi click increments is pretty darned silly.
+1 for more automation of the drone work.
Equipment upgrades, VP spending, training, should all be able to be set into automated sequences.
I am retiring 50 dots and selling two teams at the end of the season because I no longer have time to maintain them all, not because I can't afford them. APD is a double edged sword. It makes the game more interesting for those with fewer dots, but the ones that have and will continue to spend a ton of money here are becoming strained by the amount of work maintaining 150+ dots is. I know several people that keep a ton of dots that are in this boat and contemplating trimming down. GLB might see more $20-$50 flex purchases every season from the people with 25 dots, but if the big builders trim back because of time, the $275, $500, and $1000 purchases will slow down dramatically.
Spending an hour every night mindlessly clicking "+1" on the vet points of 50 or 60 players is a ridiculous part of that, that needs repeated the following night on 50 or 60 other players. If you can make dot maintenance a little easier by doing something like this, it makes it easier for the big spenders to maintain those large numbers of dots and continue to spend large amounts of money.
It's common sense. If a man wants to pay you $1000 every other season to keep 200 dots, why would you hold that man back from doing that by not giving him the tools to maintain such a large number of players? APD has made the game more interesting for agents with fewer players, and perhaps they are spending more. I am glad for that. How though, is it helpful when you increase the number of small purchases by reducing the number of large purchases at the same time? For every Hall Of Fame pack you lose from the big spenders you need to sell 20 of the $50 packages to recoup the loss.
Make dot maintenance easier for big spenders and you can have the best of both worlds.
I call it the Zen of Dot Maintenance, mindless clicking is kinda relaxing if you do it cross legged naked while humming "ohmmmmm".
I am an advocate of more things to do with your dot, more choices and strategies.
But once the choice is made having to come back and implement it in fiften multi click increments is pretty darned silly.
+1 for more automation of the drone work.
Equipment upgrades, VP spending, training, should all be able to be set into automated sequences.
Kirghiz
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
I call it the Zen of Dot Maintenance, mindless clicking is kinda relaxing if you do it cross legged naked while humming "ohmmmmm".
I prefer to do it naked, in a beanbag chair, eating cheetos, but to each their own.
I call it the Zen of Dot Maintenance, mindless clicking is kinda relaxing if you do it cross legged naked while humming "ohmmmmm".
I prefer to do it naked, in a beanbag chair, eating cheetos, but to each their own.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























