Warrior General Games

Yeah, its kinda dumb for an owner to give ANYONE other than himself (or herself). And its even worse that if you give the Co-Owner title to anyone they HAVEEE to have cut powers. IMO you should be able to remove cut powers without removing Co-Owner title from the person.

EDIT: At first when you click on the cut powers box it goes away, but when you click update it gives them back to the Co Owner

Those titles are supposed to mean something and not just be a trophy with a fancy title...

if you don't trust someone to not cut someone from your team, he or she should probably not be a co-owner. Co-owner honestly should have all the rights as an owner, seeing as the title is co-owner and not assistant owner or anything like that.


It's just like you wouldn't give someone the OC title if you didn't want to give them the ability to mess with offense or defense

Originally posted by Chysil
Those titles are supposed to mean something and not just be a trophy with a fancy title...

if you don't trust someone to not cut someone from your team, he or she should probably not be a co-owner. Co-owner honestly should have all the rights as an owner, seeing as the title is co-owner and not assistant owner or anything like that.


It's just like you wouldn't give someone the OC title if you didn't want to give them the ability to mess with offense or defense

+1 to this.

-1 to OP if you don't trust them, don't hire them.

Have to agree with the above. If you don't know someone well enough to know they won't abuse their privileges, don't give them to em.

Though i would say that perhaps signing and cutting should be separated in the permission list, assuming they are not now.

So -1 to co-owner change.

Originally posted by Chysil
Those titles are supposed to mean something and not just be a trophy with a fancy title...

if you don't trust someone to not cut someone from your team, he or she should probably not be a co-owner. Co-owner honestly should have all the rights as an owner, seeing as the title is co-owner and not assistant owner or anything like that.


It's just like you wouldn't give someone the OC title if you didn't want to give them the ability to mess with offense or defense

precisely

Originally posted by redsoxboy34
Yeah, its kinda dumb for an owner to give ANYONE other than himself (or herself). And its even worse that if you give the Co-Owner title to anyone they HAVEEE to have cut powers. IMO you should be able to remove cut powers without removing Co-Owner title from the person.

EDIT: At first when you click on the cut powers box it goes away, but when you click update it gives them back to the Co Owner

-1

Originally posted by Chysil
Those titles are supposed to mean something and not just be a trophy with a fancy title...

if you don't trust someone to not cut someone from your team, he or she should probably not be a co-owner. Co-owner honestly should have all the rights as an owner, seeing as the title is co-owner and not assistant owner or anything like that.


It's just like you wouldn't give someone the OC title if you didn't want to give them the ability to mess with offense or defense

+1

-1

-1

Originally posted by Chysil
Those titles are supposed to mean something and not just be a trophy with a fancy title...

if you don't trust someone to not cut someone from your team, he or she should probably not be a co-owner. Co-owner honestly should have all the rights as an owner, seeing as the title is co-owner and not assistant owner or anything like that.


It's just like you wouldn't give someone the OC title if you didn't want to give them the ability to mess with offense or defense

Bingo. Co-owner is just that.

Chysil is right on target there.

-1 to OP

+1

We should be able to decide which abilities any GM has.

I never really saw the point of Co-owner in the first place.

In Casual you really don't even need GM's that much.

Originally posted by All American Dude
+1

We should be able to decide which abilities any GM has.

This, I mean. You know how stupid people can be on this game? Piss off the Co Owner and he rage releases everyone on your team. How is that fair?

Don't have a co-owner then if you do not feel you can trust people on the site. Same goes with giving access to the tactics/DC/signing players etc.

I'd agree with dub but can't because all that would happen if you detached permissions from titles is people would just move their lolgm's to those positions.