Warrior General Games

Please Add Either LOLB2 and MLB2 Depth Chart Assignments And/Or Formation Based Advanced Energy Settings.

And MLB2 and LOLB2 (and really an MLB3) slot would allow us to use the current LLB1 MLB1 slots to have situational switches for run/pass plays and then use the LLB/MLB2 Slots for Dime plays where the ROLBs could be added to the rotation. This would allow more tactical choices and also help avoid frustrated ROLBs who miss alot of downs if the bad guy goes three+ wide alot. Similarly an MLB3 slot would let us fit the LLB and RLBs into the MLB rotation in the Quarter.

Also adding into the Formation Depth Chart Tab advanced energy settings for those formations (or for the new DC slots for MLB2/3 LLB2 in normal location) would help with this as well or alternatively.

I think that it has already been said there would be no more added depth chart slots. I may be wrong but I am pretty sure this is NGTH.

and Yello1 before I get the usual question of why I do not agree. here is goes if you add something like this to the defense then you have to add something to the offense as well to be able to counter it. thus the reason I am sure this is NGTH.

Originally posted by hatchman
I think that it has already been said there would be no more added depth chart slots. I may be wrong but I am pretty sure this is NGTH.

and Yello1 before I get the usual question of why I do not agree. here is goes if you add something like this to the defense then you have to add something to the offense as well to be able to counter it. thus the reason I am sure this is NGTH.

Which is also why we can't have custom DE slots too. So lolyello you can skip that one too.

NGTH list....read it, know it.

- Custom slot additions

It would save maybe 1-2 suggestions a day from you. Maybe, just maybe if they start giving the mini-forum vacations it calls for, you will finally stop just throwing shit out there because you have nothing better to do. Another moment in time we can't get back thanks to you.

Originally posted by hatchman
I think that it has already been said there would be no more added depth chart slots. I may be wrong but I am pretty sure this is NGTH.

and Yello1 before I get the usual question of why I do not agree. here is goes if you add something like this to the defense then you have to add something to the offense as well to be able to counter it. thus the reason I am sure this is NGTH.

The three wide position with WR1 Wr2 WR3 WR4 WR5 deptch chart slots IS the thing the offense has.

MLB2/3 LLB2 is what is needed to deal with THAT.

Originally posted by yello1
The three wide position with WR1 Wr2 WR3 WR4 WR5 deptch chart slots IS the thing the offense has.

MLB2/3 LLB2 is what is needed to deal with THAT.



read your NGTH list and stop arguing this has already been covered. it was brought up a while back about extra DC slots for DE's and it was posted then no new depth chart slots.

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
Originally posted by hatchman

I think that it has already been said there would be no more added depth chart slots. I may be wrong but I am pretty sure this is NGTH.

and Yello1 before I get the usual question of why I do not agree. here is goes if you add something like this to the defense then you have to add something to the offense as well to be able to counter it. thus the reason I am sure this is NGTH.

Which is also why we can't have custom DE slots too. So lolyello you can skip that one too.

I'd actually seen someone suggest the DE1 slot before so didn't go there.

Originally posted by yello1
I'd actually seen someone suggest the DE1 slot before so didn't go there.


your suggestion is the same as that one they said that it was NGTH so why argue with people that are just telling you that they have already said no to this idea.

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1

The three wide position with WR1 Wr2 WR3 WR4 WR5 deptch chart slots IS the thing the offense has.

MLB2/3 LLB2 is what is needed to deal with THAT.



read your NGTH list and stop arguing this has already been covered. it was brought up a while back about extra DC slots for DE's and it was posted then no new depth chart slots.

The case for DE is purely tactics. A good cause but lesser one.

However the case for a DC that allows the agents with dots at ROLB and LOLB who wind up riding the pines in games facing multiwide out offenses deals with customer satisfaction in a big way.

You seem to be a Owner Operator kinda guy but if you have ever run a team where you had a human agent at the positions that are put by the way side on the multiwideout defenses you must have fielded complaints about play time?

Players complaining about not being able to play the game should be something that Bort cares about more than player tactics.

As such whatever concerns shot down the DE1 requests might not be big enough to shoot down a LOLB2/MLB2 suggestion.

Because its really a different breed of cat even if its in the same Genus.

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1

I'd actually seen someone suggest the DE1 slot before so didn't go there.


your suggestion is the same as that one they said that it was NGTH so why argue with people that are just telling you that they have already said no to this idea.

Fight the Power, always and every day.

And its a different situation, as noted in last post.

Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
NGTH list....read it, know it.

- Custom slot additions

It would save maybe 1-2 suggestions a day from you. Maybe, just maybe if they start giving the mini-forum vacations it calls for, you will finally stop just throwing shit out there because you have nothing better to do. Another moment in time we can't get back thanks to you.



If wasting time posts was a crime, you sir would need a very good lawyer on speed dial.

It is simple those players do not have to ride the pine they can get useful snaps on ST's and they can back-up the other LBer spots. basically if you cannot get the players their needed snaps then you are doing something wrong as a coordinator.

also the reason I know this isn't going to happen is a while back I suggested the same thing for the O-linemen. basically my idea there was to be able to sub in a pass blocking O-line and a run blocking O-line. I even went as far as to just ask for the LT position to be LT 1 and LT 2 so that the offense had a way to combat the pass rush DE's.

GUESS WHAT THEY SAID THAT IT WAS NGTH.

Originally posted by hatchman
It is simple those players do not have to ride the pine they can get useful snaps on ST's and they can back-up the other LBer spots. basically if you cannot get the players their needed snaps then you are doing something wrong as a coordinator.

also the reason I know this isn't going to happen is a while back I suggested the same thing for the O-linemen. basically my idea there was to be able to sub in a pass blocking O-line and a run blocking O-line. I even went as far as to just ask for the LT position to be LT 1 and LT 2 so that the offense had a way to combat the pass rush DE's.

GUESS WHAT THEY SAID THAT IT WAS NGTH.

People want stats for their players and ST play does not do that. Trust me, I have tried that angle.

As for backing up at other positions, you want 6 LBs at least, so you have two LBs at each position in the 4-3 (assuming you go with a four three). If the ROLB is blanked out of a game that means you have to be prepared for that by having LOLB and MLB three deep. That means less play time for those players in general, and it means putting your natural blitzin or whatever ROLB into your normal LOLB coverage in a 43 which is two different situations. Plus you would really need to have SIX players in on MLB depth for the quarter sets, which means wow your LBs now have to be built for every position in 43 and 34 and Dime and Quarter play. Complicated and ridiculous.

Or you could just add two-three depth chart slots.

Given that Bort just added a new 3 wide and a new 4 wide formation to the game its only natural to adjust other game features to accomodate the increased use of multiwideout offenses.

Which is, again, a different situation from asking for LDE1 OT1 etc slots. Those are good ideas too (kudos) but that is just a tactical thing, not a ha ha you signed with my team but didnt get play time thing.

Custom slot additions are NGTH. They're even on the list.