It was fun at first, but now it's not.
Forum > Suggestions > Lower Teams Owned Limit
even though I know this is a joke thread it could have some merit to actually cutting a couple of leagues out where there aren't enough players to fill the teams. and would possibly help in bringing the waiting list back for team ownership. which would inevitably mean less of the buy a team and then sell it for no real reason strategy.
secondly I would argue this just to be able to read what load of crap yello1 spews into the thread.
secondly I would argue this just to be able to read what load of crap yello1 spews into the thread.
Achelon
offline
offline
It's not a joke thread, and screw yello, why the fuck am i getting labeled into the poke fun a yello society. I don't even read his threads.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
Guppy, Inc
online
online
i'm seeing 1st hand this season how badly human players get handicapped if there are too many cpus on the team. people should have to earn the privilege of owning more than 1 team. any player on a human owned team that isnt fully human players will suck from now on, so why would people even sign there now?
Originally posted by CNinja
It's not a joke thread, and screw yello, why the fuck am i getting labeled into the poke fun a yello society. I don't even read his threads.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
no need for the childish rants save that for your FFA posts. and if you would actually take the time to try to read and understand what was posted you would see no one lumped you with yello1 I simply said that I couldn't wait until he decided to post his usual load of crap into the thread.
It's not a joke thread, and screw yello, why the fuck am i getting labeled into the poke fun a yello society. I don't even read his threads.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
no need for the childish rants save that for your FFA posts. and if you would actually take the time to try to read and understand what was posted you would see no one lumped you with yello1 I simply said that I couldn't wait until he decided to post his usual load of crap into the thread.
Originally posted by CNinja
It's not a joke thread, and screw yello, why the fuck am i getting labeled into the poke fun a yello society. I don't even read his threads.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
You could at least buy me dinner first
The CPU team nerf should put an end to the latter
The former doesnt make sense. How would less ability to own lead to less CPU teams?
I havent taken a survey but the guys who dump teams tend to be one team owners who sampled the process and found it wanting.
You want less teams, which is what you need to get less CPU teams (if you hate my own MORE teams idea which also solves some of the problem), then you need to argue league contraction.
Which is not a bad idea at lower tiers.
It's not a joke thread, and screw yello, why the fuck am i getting labeled into the poke fun a yello society. I don't even read his threads.
The ability to own more teams, just leads to more cpu, and human owned teams with cpu players on it.
You could at least buy me dinner first
The CPU team nerf should put an end to the latter
The former doesnt make sense. How would less ability to own lead to less CPU teams?
I havent taken a survey but the guys who dump teams tend to be one team owners who sampled the process and found it wanting.
You want less teams, which is what you need to get less CPU teams (if you hate my own MORE teams idea which also solves some of the problem), then you need to argue league contraction.
Which is not a bad idea at lower tiers.
Kirghiz
offline
offline
Drop max teams to 6, but remove "type" limits. That way if someone wants to own all casual or all regular teams, they can do that.
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Drop max teams to 6, but remove "type" limits. That way if someone wants to own all casual or all regular teams, they can do that.
+1
I also think you should play 1 full season before you can buy a team. Just my thoughts tho.
Drop max teams to 6, but remove "type" limits. That way if someone wants to own all casual or all regular teams, they can do that.
+1
I also think you should play 1 full season before you can buy a team. Just my thoughts tho.
Skoll Wolfrun
offline
offline
Originally posted by joe
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Drop max teams to 6, but remove "type" limits. That way if someone wants to own all casual or all regular teams, they can do that.
+1
I also think you should play 1 full season before you can buy a team. Just my thoughts tho.
Also think there should be a 1 team limit for 1st season, 2 team limit for 2nd season, etc. No reason to let someone jump in for 4+ teams, get overwhelmed & just sell off/go inactive on it all.
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Drop max teams to 6, but remove "type" limits. That way if someone wants to own all casual or all regular teams, they can do that.
+1
I also think you should play 1 full season before you can buy a team. Just my thoughts tho.
Also think there should be a 1 team limit for 1st season, 2 team limit for 2nd season, etc. No reason to let someone jump in for 4+ teams, get overwhelmed & just sell off/go inactive on it all.
XxMetalAddictxX
offline
offline
I like the idea of having to wait a season before owning a team and then after that you can own a team your 2nd season and get the privilege to own one more team every season till you hit 6 or so
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























