First off we start with 'Rankings'.
Now everyone wants to base it on records, team ranks, chemistry but lets cut through the lies right here.
These rankings suffer from what I call NY Doom syndrome, where you pound on bad teams and your good stats and undefeated record makes you look better than you are.
The best ranking system is based on wins against teams with a winning record and total loses. Team with the same records are considered tied.
Indianapolis 4-0
Ho Playbook 3-2
St Louis 3-2
Miami C 2-1
NY Doom 1-2
RCI 1-3
Montpelier 1-3
Cleveland 1-4
Charlotte 0-3
Miami 0-4
Chicago 0-5
Palmyra 0-6
Albany 0-6
Pittsburgh 0-7
Tampa 0-8
Nashville 0-8
Second we check Omaha's loss to the Pissers.
I asked EC some questions but his answer were politically correct and boring so decided to cut through the lies.
Any general comments about your loss EC?
EC: KC is known for getting lucky against good teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8096808
What do you contribute your fourth quarter meltdown to?
EC: The game should have went our way but what can you do...
Your offense and pass defense played pretty shitty any comments?
EC: Yeah we were trying out a new strat that we won't be using again.
After surgical like investigatory journalism I have discovered that a back up FS playing CB was burned for the winning touchdown I'd imagine destroying his confidence leading to that same player fumbling away the ensuing kickoff.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8096927
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8097044
That same player being burned on the second touchdown of the fourth quarter.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=235690
Which leads this reporter to ask Omaha depth chart problems?
When contacted for his take on the strategy NY's GM Bigpimpin mumbled depth chart shenanigans a few times before signing offline.
Now everyone wants to base it on records, team ranks, chemistry but lets cut through the lies right here.
These rankings suffer from what I call NY Doom syndrome, where you pound on bad teams and your good stats and undefeated record makes you look better than you are.
The best ranking system is based on wins against teams with a winning record and total loses. Team with the same records are considered tied.
Indianapolis 4-0
Ho Playbook 3-2
St Louis 3-2
Miami C 2-1
NY Doom 1-2
RCI 1-3
Montpelier 1-3
Cleveland 1-4
Charlotte 0-3
Miami 0-4
Chicago 0-5
Palmyra 0-6
Albany 0-6
Pittsburgh 0-7
Tampa 0-8
Nashville 0-8
Second we check Omaha's loss to the Pissers.
I asked EC some questions but his answer were politically correct and boring so decided to cut through the lies.
Any general comments about your loss EC?
EC: KC is known for getting lucky against good teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8096808
What do you contribute your fourth quarter meltdown to?
EC: The game should have went our way but what can you do...
Your offense and pass defense played pretty shitty any comments?
EC: Yeah we were trying out a new strat that we won't be using again.
After surgical like investigatory journalism I have discovered that a back up FS playing CB was burned for the winning touchdown I'd imagine destroying his confidence leading to that same player fumbling away the ensuing kickoff.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8096927
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=8097044
That same player being burned on the second touchdown of the fourth quarter.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=235690
Which leads this reporter to ask Omaha depth chart problems?
When contacted for his take on the strategy NY's GM Bigpimpin mumbled depth chart shenanigans a few times before signing offline.
Last edited Jun 27, 2008 08:05:10






























