Warrior General Games

I know D league is kinda lol, but seriously, I got three kickers on my D league team for the second year in a row. Meanwhile, other teams have only one kicker and he's lower level than any of the kickers on my team.

Just put an automatic stop on new kickers if there is another team in D league that only has one kicker.

Prolly same for puters.

Originally posted by Lurchy
I know D league is really lol, but seriously, I got three kickers on my D league team for the second year in a row. Meanwhile, other teams have only one kicker and he's lower level than any of the kickers on my team.

Just put an automatic stop on new kickers if there is another team in D league that only has one kicker.

Prolly same for punters.


Why waste time with this not very helpful suggestion? So many things > this

OP is correct, redsoxboy nice trolling.

Originally posted by cymaddux31
OP is correct, redsoxboy nice trolling.

I'm just saying. Its D league. Should 40000 kickers be on a team? No, should that be the FIRST thing GLB works on? LOL no

-1, with regrets. It's a crappy situation, but kicker #2 and #3 knew what they were getting when they accepted the contract. Limiting offers will just create situations where players aren't getting any offers, which is a worse situation than being buried on a depth chart.

-1000

Originally posted by Lurchy
I know D league is kinda lol, but seriously, I got three kickers on my D league team for the second year in a row. Meanwhile, other teams have only one kicker and he's lower level than any of the kickers on my team.

Just put an automatic stop on new kickers if there is another team in D league that only has one kicker.

Prolly same for puters.

nice avatar though

Originally posted by CDZYO
-1, with regrets. It's a crappy situation, but kicker #2 and #3 knew what they were getting when they accepted the contract. Limiting offers will just create situations where players aren't getting any offers, which is a worse situation than being buried on a depth chart.

This.

Originally posted by CDZYO
-1, with regrets. It's a crappy situation, but kicker #2 and #3 knew what they were getting when they accepted the contract. Limiting offers will just create situations where players aren't getting any offers, which is a worse situation than being buried on a depth chart.

Yay common sense. We, as players, don't want to even give Bort the idea that we want less options or less choice as far as where we play.

When players accept contracts they see... "X players on the roster at this position".. What more can GLB do to try and slow down incompetence?

-1

+1

However, there should only be 1 kicker
and 1 punter

+1 D Leagues are retarded in the setup..needs an overhaul

-1 just delete D leagues

Originally posted by CDZYO
-1, with regrets. It's a crappy situation, but kicker #2 and #3 knew what they were getting when they accepted the contract. Limiting offers will just create situations where players aren't getting any offers, which is a worse situation than being buried on a depth chart.

not true... the #2 and #3 could have signed first but then kicker #1 comes and sees he is better then the other two and signs.

Originally posted by Ohio State
not true... the #2 and #3 could have signed first but then kicker #1 comes and sees he is better then the other two and signs.

#2 and #3 refers to the signing order, not the depth chart.