Warrior General Games

Most player positions are in low demand. This means we need more team owners. Raise the limit to four per league type!

I hope this is a joke.

-1

9 teams per Agent is enough in my opinion.

-1 If anything we need to reign in the amount of teams that any one agent can own. Shouldn't be more than 2 of any given type imo.

Because there just are not enough teams as is?

Pish and Posh

Would be less CPU owned teams if owners could own more clubs.

Originally posted by yello1
Pish and Posh

Would be less CPU owned teams if owners could own more clubs.



Teams who have owners who have their attention spread too thin essentially become the equivalent of CPU teams..

Besides, it would just lead to the sale of or just the abandonment of teams that have losing records midseason.

Originally posted by merenoise
-1 If anything we need to reign in the amount of teams that any one agent can own. Shouldn't be more than 2 of any given type imo.

Better then some newb owner who can't fill a roster.

Originally posted by Myd
Teams who have owners who have their attention spread too thin essentially become the equivalent of CPU teams..

Besides, it would just lead to the sale of or just the abandonment of teams that have losing records midseason.

I have 7 teams and that just aint so.

It just means you hire OCs and DCs to run the teams. More opportunities for more fun for more people.

Anyway its simple economics. Supply has exceeded demand. Demand is artificially capped. Remove the cap to use up the excess supply.

If supply had truly exceeded demand we wouldn't see leagues like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/league.pl?league_id=10 13 teams with 0 players, another 15 teams with less than 40 human players

Mind you that many of those vacant teams in that league are owned by agents who own multiple teams

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5167
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=4410
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=525
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=197
etc.

In fact the OP owns 7 teams none of which are fielding a full roster with the majority of his teams not even carrying 50 dots. If supply was exceeding demand all of those teams would be full up. When and if the OP can actually fill all these teams he wants to own maybe this suggestion would have some merit, but at the moment that clearly isn't the case.

Originally posted by merenoise
If supply had truly exceeded demand we wouldn't see leagues like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/league.pl?league_id=10 13 teams with 0 players, another 15 teams with less than 40 human players

Mind you that many of those vacant teams in that league are owned by agents who own multiple teams

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5167
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=4410
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=525
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=197
etc.

In fact the OP owns 7 teams none of which are fielding a full roster with the majority of his teams not even carrying 50 dots. If supply was exceeding demand all of those teams would be full up. When and if the OP can actually fill all these teams he wants to own maybe this suggestion would have some merit, but at the moment that clearly isn't the case.

Good point to an extent, however it must be noted that my lower teams are not actively managed by me to the extent that I seek out 55 man rosters. They are casual clubs. I put my guys on them that I need homes for and use auto offer for the rest (for some clubs, others I have HCs that recruit). Since auto offer does not factor in STOP players, the rosters tend to just fill up to the standard positions two deep or about 44 players.

-1 to OP I would rather see less teams owned by agents. seriously there are so many teams that people own that are no better than CPU teams.

-1

Originally posted by Myd
-1

9 teams per Agent is enough in my opinion.

Is too much imo