What is the point to short term contract really who the heck is gonna sign their dot for just 15 20 or 25 days its pointless tbh
Forum > Suggestions > Get Rid of Short Term Contract
Moral? Or maybe a team decides to fold midseason and wants to give its dots a chance to prove themselves available the next season?
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
Moral? Or maybe a team decides to fold midseason and wants to give its dots a chance to prove themselves available the next season?
Your argument doesn't make sense? If they decide to fold... they are on a CPU team. Anyone can sign someone off of a CPU team...
Moral? Or maybe a team decides to fold midseason and wants to give its dots a chance to prove themselves available the next season?
Your argument doesn't make sense? If they decide to fold... they are on a CPU team. Anyone can sign someone off of a CPU team...
Originally posted by redsoxboy34
Your argument doesn't make sense? If they decide to fold... they are on a CPU team. Anyone can sign someone off of a CPU team...
Ok. They plan on folding after the season, the dot is signed to a 2 season contract and another teams see that, discouraging them from making plans for that dot. Am I not understanding what he means by a short term contract? One that ends during the current, active season?
Your argument doesn't make sense? If they decide to fold... they are on a CPU team. Anyone can sign someone off of a CPU team...
Ok. They plan on folding after the season, the dot is signed to a 2 season contract and another teams see that, discouraging them from making plans for that dot. Am I not understanding what he means by a short term contract? One that ends during the current, active season?
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
Ok. They plan on folding after the season, the dot is signed to a 2 season contract and another teams see that, discouraging them from making plans for that dot. Am I not understanding what he means by a short term contract? One that ends during the current, active season?
Short term, is like if I signed you on day one. And your contract ends before day 40....
So If I signed you to a 2 season contract and its around day 40 I would either A. cut them or B. if it was before day 40 I would just renegotiate the contract.
Ok. They plan on folding after the season, the dot is signed to a 2 season contract and another teams see that, discouraging them from making plans for that dot. Am I not understanding what he means by a short term contract? One that ends during the current, active season?
Short term, is like if I signed you on day one. And your contract ends before day 40....
So If I signed you to a 2 season contract and its around day 40 I would either A. cut them or B. if it was before day 40 I would just renegotiate the contract.
But it would still say day 40 of next season on the player page during the current season, potentially discouraging other teams from being interested. Especially those that don't communicate...
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
But it would still say day 40 of next season on the player page during the current season, potentially discouraging other teams from being interested. Especially those that don't communicate...
NO
If it was day 39. and I signed a player to a ONE SEASON. Its the closest day 40.
"Contract Length (1 season means the contract ends on day 40 of THIS SEASON)"
if it is two Seasons. It is not the closest day 40 but the one after.
Zing
But it would still say day 40 of next season on the player page during the current season, potentially discouraging other teams from being interested. Especially those that don't communicate...
NO
If it was day 39. and I signed a player to a ONE SEASON. Its the closest day 40.
"Contract Length (1 season means the contract ends on day 40 of THIS SEASON)"
if it is two Seasons. It is not the closest day 40 but the one after.
Zing
Edited by redsoxboy34 on Dec 16, 2011 01:34:37
Ken1
offline
offline
-1.
It's an option. No one has to use it. I'm against taking away options that don't hurt anyone and don't provide an unfair advantage to anyone.
It's an option. No one has to use it. I'm against taking away options that don't hurt anyone and don't provide an unfair advantage to anyone.
PatrickStump
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ken1
-1.
It's an option. No one has to use it. I'm against taking away options that don't hurt anyone and don't provide an unfair advantage to anyone.
this
-1.
It's an option. No one has to use it. I'm against taking away options that don't hurt anyone and don't provide an unfair advantage to anyone.
this
Originally posted by -NDR-
What is the point to short term contract really who the heck is gonna sign their dot for just 15 20 or 25 days its pointless tbh
Someone who doesn't trust a owner, and wants to make sure the team they go to is a decent team and what they promise they are
What is the point to short term contract really who the heck is gonna sign their dot for just 15 20 or 25 days its pointless tbh
Someone who doesn't trust a owner, and wants to make sure the team they go to is a decent team and what they promise they are
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
