Warrior General Games

right now, not sure everyone knows, but in casual team you have no control over 30% of your play-calling by formations. Go ahead, do the tests, I did and it came down to about 30%.

Basically it doesn't matter what you sent your settings to under the offense tab, 30% of your plays will be called by GLB, not according to your settings. These are almost always Single-back plays, fwiw.

My suggestion is to give causal team FULL control. If they put 100% Strong I, let it be 100% Strong I.

Hell if a regular team had 30% of it's plays changed there would be a huge uproar. Let causal be fully un-hinged!

It it pretty funny I have my formation percents spread out and have shotgun set to 0. Of course it calls shotgun plays. Auto adjust off and all of the play calls based on score are unchecked. I agree 100% with this, but, GLB doesn't give a shit about casual so I'm afraid it's no use.

Just wait till the guys come in here and put lolCasual.

Bort had a good (enough) reason for not allowing stuff like 100% Strong-I. Wish I could remember it.

Because you can pretty much pick your plays if we were allowed to completely choose our formation.

Originally posted by geekor
right now, not sure everyone knows, but in casual team you have no control over 30% of your play-calling by formations. Go ahead, do the tests, I did and it came down to about 30%.

id like to see these studies

+100000


5% is the new 35%

wtf?

why would this exist.

Originally posted by geekor
right now, not sure everyone knows, but in casual team you have no control over 30% of your play-calling by formations. Go ahead, do the tests, I did and it came down to about 30%.

Basically it doesn't matter what you sent your settings to under the offense tab, 30% of your plays will be called by GLB, not according to your settings. These are almost always Single-back plays, fwiw.

My suggestion is to give causal team FULL control. If they put 100% Strong I, let it be 100% Strong I.

Hell if a regular team had 30% of it's plays changed there would be a huge uproar. Let causal be fully un-hinged!

My biggest bitch with this game right here...

Originally posted by Deathblade
id like to see these studies

Journal of GLB Studies, Volume III, Pg. 567-588

better JSTOR that shit

what does JSTOR mean?

Originally posted by geekor
right now, not sure everyone knows, but in casual team you have no control over 30% of your play-calling by formations. Go ahead, do the tests, I did and it came down to about 30%.

Basically it doesn't matter what you sent your settings to under the offense tab, 30% of your plays will be called by GLB, not according to your settings. These are almost always Single-back plays, fwiw.

My suggestion is to give causal team FULL control. If they put 100% Strong I, let it be 100% Strong I.

Hell if a regular team had 30% of it's plays changed there would be a huge uproar. Let causal be fully un-hinged!

Yes, I did the same tests and reported it, first as a bug (working as intended), then it was suggested to speak to Catch22. Catch22 told me it was an "anti-play spamming" fix. The fix stinks, imo. I would fully support more control over a casual team.

Originally posted by The Avenger
+100000


5% is the new 35%



Occupy Casual Leagues!

Originally posted by Handmonster
Originally posted by geekor

right now, not sure everyone knows, but in casual team you have no control over 30% of your play-calling by formations. Go ahead, do the tests, I did and it came down to about 30%.

Basically it doesn't matter what you sent your settings to under the offense tab, 30% of your plays will be called by GLB, not according to your settings. These are almost always Single-back plays, fwiw.

My suggestion is to give causal team FULL control. If they put 100% Strong I, let it be 100% Strong I.

Hell if a regular team had 30% of it's plays changed there would be a huge uproar. Let causal be fully un-hinged!

Yes, I did the same tests and reported it, first as a bug (working as intended), then it was suggested to speak to Catch22. Catch22 told me it was an "anti-play spamming" fix. The fix stinks, imo. I would fully support more control over a casual team.

Pretty pathetic excuse for a fix.

Problem: My room stinks like cigarettes.
Solution: Bort shits in the corner. Now you can't smell the cigarette stink.

My suggestion is to let us only use 70% then. Since the other 30% doesn't matter.

So I wonder if they have that anti spamming fix in there, can auto adjust really work? Isn't it supposed to call plays that are working? To me that would almost be spamming.

Originally posted by bdnannac
So I wonder if they have that anti spamming fix in there, can auto adjust really work? Isn't it supposed to call plays that are working? To me that would almost be spamming.

It calls plays that are working when it wants to, no matter how you have that option set, and deviates when it wants to, no matter how you have that option set.

It's jacked. Totally. And freaking irritating. Totally.

+1 for unhinging