User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Rate my Player > How much speed is too much?
Page:
 
BDawk
offline
Link
 
My CB is nearing on how much speed I would call too much. Looking at him (level 43) how much speed should he have?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
My level 35 has 91 speed and will be 92 once I train it over in a few days, but I wouldn't put skill points in there beyond the sixth or maybe seventh cap.
 
BDawk
offline
Link
 
With all equipment in speed I'll have like 150 speed (with equipment) some day. That's not too much? Should I split EQ?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Hard to say, given that we don't know how fast WRs will be. It also depends on what you have in agility.
 
BDawk
offline
Link
 
How high should agility be? Both end-game and now. Thanks for your help so far.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
85-90, probably (end-build). It depends on your role and your spot on the depth chart. If you're mostly playing CB1 or CB2 then you probably don't need as much agility as CB3 or CB4. Furthermore, remember that you need 60+ stamina by the end-build to take full advantage of high speed.
Edited by jdbolick on Dec 6, 2010 19:56:46
 
bug03
offline
Link
 
150/90 is sexy
 
3ebfan511
offline
Link
 
lol, this is funny.
 
Anthony911
offline
Link
 
no speed is too much speed I wonder what happen if a WR or HB have 150 speed and 100 agi?? That would be awesomme
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Anthony911
no speed is too much speed I wonder what happen if a WR or HB have 150 speed and 100 agi?? That would be awesomme


150 speed/90 agility will probably be average for a WR or elusive HB in WL using archetypes. Some WRs are going to be closer to 160 speed and some will probably end up with 164 or 165. Anything above that will probably be pushing it too far to have an effective build, but there may be a few agents that try to get it closer to 170.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
150 speed/90 agility will probably be average for a WR or elusive HB in WL using archetypes. Some WRs are going to be closer to 160 speed and some will probably end up with 164 or 165. Anything above that will probably be pushing it too far to have an effective build, but there may be a few agents that try to get it closer to 170.


But the OP has to remember that CBs don't need the same amount of speed/agility to keep up with faster WRs.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
But the OP has to remember that CBs don't need the same amount of speed/agility to keep up with faster WRs.

They do on routes that aren't vertical.
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

They do on routes that aren't vertical.


I think 145 speed plus Ball Hawk will probably be fine for covering 155-160 speed WRs. They will get a little behind on non vertical routes, but 145 should keep them close enough so that they get into position before the ball gets there once Ball Hawk kicks in.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
I'm growing more and more convinced that Ball Hawk might not be that effective. How many ticks does it take a pass to go from thrown to completed? Now subtract however many ticks expire before the defender passes the check to recognize that a pass is coming. +30% to speed, agility, and vision sounds like an enormous amount, but if it's only applying for a minuscule amount of time then it's not having a huge impact. Far more important is whether or not the QB leads receivers properly. If Bort ever gets that nailed down, corners without 150+ speed will be up shit creek.
 
tautology
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Originally posted by jdbolick


They do on routes that aren't vertical.


I think 145 speed plus Ball Hawk will probably be fine for covering 155-160 speed WRs. They will get a little behind on non vertical routes, but 145 should keep them close enough so that they get into position before the ball gets there once Ball Hawk kicks in.


Unless other aspects of the sim change, I don't think you will even need 145. 140 + ballhawk will be more than enough as things currently work.



 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.