does carry on a CB help break a tackle after a Int?
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
yes...but why would you want to put points into carrying.....
Not an attribute needed on a regular CB......much more needed atts are there
Not an attribute needed on a regular CB......much more needed atts are there
mhayes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Beachsand DTD
yes...but why would you want to put points into carrying.....
Not an attribute needed on a regular CB......much more needed atts are there
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
yes...but why would you want to put points into carrying.....
Not an attribute needed on a regular CB......much more needed atts are there
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
Edited by mhayes on Mar 31, 2010 04:41:26
Worker 3
offline
offline
Originally posted by mhayes
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
along that line of thinking, you would need a -LOT- of carrying. like 70-80. and even then, not every INT would result in a TD. my lvl 63 retired could generally take down power backs in USPL with only ~50/50 strength tackling, so i think WRs, even with what little tackling they have (they are usually about on par with strength, at least late in their careers) should be able to take you down without mush hassle.
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
along that line of thinking, you would need a -LOT- of carrying. like 70-80. and even then, not every INT would result in a TD. my lvl 63 retired could generally take down power backs in USPL with only ~50/50 strength tackling, so i think WRs, even with what little tackling they have (they are usually about on par with strength, at least late in their careers) should be able to take you down without mush hassle.
mhayes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Worker 3
Originally posted by mhayes
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
along that line of thinking, you would need a -LOT- of carrying. like 70-80. and even then, not every INT would result in a TD. my lvl 63 retired could generally take down power backs in USPL with only ~50/50 strength tackling, so i think WRs, even with what little tackling they have (they are usually about on par with strength, at least late in their careers) should be able to take you down without mush hassle.
true. it was just a thought. a bad one but still a thought.
Originally posted by mhayes
because most WRers have low tackle. so if i at least soft cap carry . every Int would be a pick six.
along that line of thinking, you would need a -LOT- of carrying. like 70-80. and even then, not every INT would result in a TD. my lvl 63 retired could generally take down power backs in USPL with only ~50/50 strength tackling, so i think WRs, even with what little tackling they have (they are usually about on par with strength, at least late in their careers) should be able to take you down without mush hassle.
true. it was just a thought. a bad one but still a thought.
Tigam
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gaz
Carrying = complete waste of SP's for CB.
Unless of course he punt returning.
Carrying = complete waste of SP's for CB.
Unless of course he punt returning.
Gaz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tigam
Originally posted by Gaz
Carrying = complete waste of SP's for CB.
Unless of course he punt returning.
+1
But thats not what the OP asked
Originally posted by Gaz
Carrying = complete waste of SP's for CB.
Unless of course he punt returning.
+1
But thats not what the OP asked
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
