odessa was a fluke
Himewad
offline
offline
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
odessa was a fluke
The Cubes playing the Blitz tough doesn't have anything to do with Odessa. It certainly doesn't mean the Mojo domination two days ago was a fluke.
If you want to make comparisons across matchups, maybe the Odessa-Stuttgart game was the real fluke. I'm not saying that it was a fluke, but it carries the same weight as your statement.
odessa was a fluke
The Cubes playing the Blitz tough doesn't have anything to do with Odessa. It certainly doesn't mean the Mojo domination two days ago was a fluke.
If you want to make comparisons across matchups, maybe the Odessa-Stuttgart game was the real fluke. I'm not saying that it was a fluke, but it carries the same weight as your statement.
bacardi
offline
offline
i guess you could be right.
even though we both played our only common opponent to 4 and 5 point losses. even though both teams have fairly similar types of wins over other conference teams. even though we played with 4 KO fumbles, one of which was caused by an offensive tackle lol. even though our first offensive touch came after we were losing 21-0.
now if you can find me another non-CPU win where you guys usually cause that many fumbles or usually start off the game with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD or where your OT's usually cause fumbles, then i would totally agree with you. because otherwise, i dont think you know what a "fluke" is. but since i dont want to be a prick, i will help you out.
according to my little dictionary widget... fluke |flook| noun: unusual or unlikely chance occurrence (it also has "the part of an anchor that fastens in the ground" as another possibility)
wouldnt you agree that in a game where you start with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD, or have 4 KO fumbles, or have an offensive tackle cause a fumble, is an "unusual or unlikely chance occurrence" ? or is your argument gonna be thats how all your games "usually" go?
but i guess you could be right
even though we both played our only common opponent to 4 and 5 point losses. even though both teams have fairly similar types of wins over other conference teams. even though we played with 4 KO fumbles, one of which was caused by an offensive tackle lol. even though our first offensive touch came after we were losing 21-0.
now if you can find me another non-CPU win where you guys usually cause that many fumbles or usually start off the game with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD or where your OT's usually cause fumbles, then i would totally agree with you. because otherwise, i dont think you know what a "fluke" is. but since i dont want to be a prick, i will help you out.
according to my little dictionary widget... fluke |flook| noun: unusual or unlikely chance occurrence (it also has "the part of an anchor that fastens in the ground" as another possibility)
wouldnt you agree that in a game where you start with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD, or have 4 KO fumbles, or have an offensive tackle cause a fumble, is an "unusual or unlikely chance occurrence" ? or is your argument gonna be thats how all your games "usually" go?
but i guess you could be right
ptriley
offline
offline
lol....kudos bro.......I am not sure anyone was saying that you didn't get a shit SIM bro, If I made you think that with anything I posted, then I am sorry for that, you did get a screwy SIM, my only point was we all get them from time to time, and that doesn't mean Mojo was not a good team...IMO........really though a OT caused a FF on the KR?....hum.........an...........exploit?
....really though a OT caused a FF on the KR?....hum.........an...........exploit?ptriley
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
Originally posted by ptriley
Originally posted by lemdog
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
they will and Zeta>Alpha
Originally posted by lemdog
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
they will and Zeta>Alpha
bacardi
offline
offline
heh heh
i think odessa is a good team, their history and record show that. its no fluke they win games because... well, they usually win games
but i wouldnt jump at taking credit in beating a zeta-team-not-named-stuttgart with 4 KO fumbles and the sim starting with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD
i think by now, everyones had a shitty sim happen. usually the bad bounces even out, but there are the occasional flukes. if we were on the other side of that sim and won, my first post wouldve been "LOL fluke sim oh well sucks to be you" (im nothing if not honest)
i was wrong about 1 thing though.. it wasnt an OT causing a FF. it was the backup OT. just wanted to clarify so when you change your ST for the exploit, you use the right dot
Originally posted by ptriley
Originally posted by lemdog
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
lemdog needs to stay out of my threads when i'm on a roll. you're ruining it for me.
and zac is unstoppable. maybe someone else will beat stuttgart before we reach that level. or maybe we'll get a few fluke bounces
i think odessa is a good team, their history and record show that. its no fluke they win games because... well, they usually win games
but i wouldnt jump at taking credit in beating a zeta-team-not-named-stuttgart with 4 KO fumbles and the sim starting with TD/fumble-TD/fumble-return-TD
i think by now, everyones had a shitty sim happen. usually the bad bounces even out, but there are the occasional flukes. if we were on the other side of that sim and won, my first post wouldve been "LOL fluke sim oh well sucks to be you" (im nothing if not honest)
i was wrong about 1 thing though.. it wasnt an OT causing a FF. it was the backup OT. just wanted to clarify so when you change your ST for the exploit, you use the right dot
Originally posted by ptriley
Originally posted by lemdog
Cape Town to WL IMO
If they can figure a way to beat Blitzkrieg...
lemdog needs to stay out of my threads when i'm on a roll. you're ruining it for me.
and zac is unstoppable. maybe someone else will beat stuttgart before we reach that level. or maybe we'll get a few fluke bounces
ptriley
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
they will and Zeta>Alpha
Quit Smoking crack bro,,,,,I have been telling people you are a smart guy, and now you go off saying stupid things....lol
they will and Zeta>Alpha
Quit Smoking crack bro,,,,,I have been telling people you are a smart guy, and now you go off saying stupid things....lol
ptriley
offline
offline
Originally posted by bacardi
lemdog needs to stay out of my threads when i'm on a roll. you're ruining it for me.
and zac is unstoppable. maybe someone else will beat stuttgart before we reach that level. or maybe we'll get a few fluke bounces
Still a lot of DOT ball to go, it could happen.........back up OT....damn thats like a kick in the balls....IMO
lemdog needs to stay out of my threads when i'm on a roll. you're ruining it for me.
and zac is unstoppable. maybe someone else will beat stuttgart before we reach that level. or maybe we'll get a few fluke bounces
Still a lot of DOT ball to go, it could happen......
...back up OT....damn thats like a kick in the balls....IMOI'm here for you Bacardi, not sure I'm looking forward to The Cape Town Vs. Hood game though, son't think we have ever beaten you guys TBH, LOL Hood is LOL
bacardi
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
they will and Zeta>Alpha
cubes record in alpha, 6-10 and 5-11.
cubes record in zeta so far, 7-2.
my opinion is that alpha/zeta top teams match up pretty well. but alpha's middle-tier teams are better than zeta's.
and you guys should have no problem with us. odessa beat you by 13. we lost by 47.
you're also making me look bad. i've been standing by my statement that c-t was one of our big games this season and now all my dot teammates are making fun of me
they will and Zeta>Alpha
cubes record in alpha, 6-10 and 5-11.
cubes record in zeta so far, 7-2.
my opinion is that alpha/zeta top teams match up pretty well. but alpha's middle-tier teams are better than zeta's.
and you guys should have no problem with us. odessa beat you by 13. we lost by 47.
you're also making me look bad. i've been standing by my statement that c-t was one of our big games this season and now all my dot teammates are making fun of me
Originally posted by bacardi
Originally posted by lemdog
they will and Zeta>Alpha
cubes record in alpha, 6-10 and 5-11.
cubes record in zeta so far, 7-2.
my opinion is that alpha/zeta top teams match up pretty well. but alpha's middle-tier teams are better than zeta's.
and you guys should have no problem with us. odessa beat you by 13. we lost by 47.
you're also making me look bad. i've been standing by my statement that c-t was one of our big games this season and now all my dot teammates are making fun of me
Cubes much better this season than last, finally caught up to the rest of the league.
We should be alot better than what we are, low chem = fail, fluke sim = fail, bad owner = fail
TBH we aren't who we thought we were
Originally posted by lemdog
they will and Zeta>Alpha
cubes record in alpha, 6-10 and 5-11.
cubes record in zeta so far, 7-2.
my opinion is that alpha/zeta top teams match up pretty well. but alpha's middle-tier teams are better than zeta's.
and you guys should have no problem with us. odessa beat you by 13. we lost by 47.
you're also making me look bad. i've been standing by my statement that c-t was one of our big games this season and now all my dot teammates are making fun of me
Cubes much better this season than last, finally caught up to the rest of the league.
We should be alot better than what we are, low chem = fail, fluke sim = fail, bad owner = fail
TBH we aren't who we thought we were
Edited by lemdog on Oct 30, 2009 20:56:17
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
