User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > D Line Club > Rolling a lane clogging DT
Darkstrand
offline
Link
 
I've got it set at

6'0"-6'1"
330+

all those little stats = 8;

Doing about 6000 rolls an hour 2 hours in.

Is this viable. I estimate that about 1:1000 has the attributes/skills I want and about 1 in 20 has the height weight but there could be something I'm missing.
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
strength = 24-27

Not sure what script allows since I don't use scripts
 
Minarets36
offline
Link
 
Script will allow you to set a range of values for the roller to hit. That roll is definitely possible, you might be waiting a while for it

http://www.glbwiki.com/index.php?title=Roll_Probability

At that specific ht/wight, and hitting all 8s, your probability is:

Height, Weight, 6 minors hitting 8, 24 strength.

(28%)(7%)(33%)(33%)(33%)(33%)(33%)(33%)(0.003%) = 0.00000008% chance of hitting or 8 in 100,000,000


 
Darkstrand
offline
Link
 
what do you think of this roll:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1689863

20 strength 16 agility 338 lbs

but it's 6'6"
 
Ericboderic
offline
Link
 
good role.

but your name is lame.

oh sick burn.
 
Link
 
I don't really know why you would want tall. I don't know how the code works, but irl shorter is often better. Tall is good for pass rushers, but long is more important.
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Darren McFadden
I don't really know why you would want tall. I don't know how the code works, but irl shorter is often better. Tall is good for pass rushers, but long is more important.


Best DT in the NFL is 6'6.
 
Link
 
richard seymour? albert haynesworth? kevin williams is 6'5", so I guess you have a point.
 
Madd_Maxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Darren McFadden
I don't really know why you would want tall. I don't know how the code works, but irl shorter is often better. Tall is good for pass rushers, but long is more important.


I have short, tall, heavy and light DT's, doesnt seem to make a difference to this point.
 
catcher_0_3
offline
Link
 
In real life, it is better to be tall at DT. Very few DTs in the NFL are under 6 feet. On this game though, I'm pretty sure you want a short DT. Gives him a lower center of gravity. The only thing I can see height helping with is swatting balls at the LOS.
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Madd_Maxx
I have short, tall, heavy and light DT's, doesnt seem to make a difference to this point.


Interesting. I've noticed with my DTs that taller tend to get more PDs. Lighter needs more tackling to tackle as well.
 
Absolut Zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Interesting. I've noticed with my DTs that taller tend to get more PDs. Lighter needs more tackling to tackle as well.


My DT is 6'4, has 17% deflect ball (came packaged with something else on my AEQ), zero PD's this season.
 
Absolut Zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by catcher_0_3
In real life, it is better to be tall at DT. Very few DTs in the NFL are under 6 feet. On this game though, I'm pretty sure you want a short DT. Gives him a lower center of gravity. The only thing I can see height helping with is swatting balls at the LOS.


I don't think there's a single DT under 6 feet in the NFL, but 6 feet is short, under 6'3 is considered short I think.

But NT's tend to be shorter heavier dudes. Casey Hampton, Kelly Gregg, Vince Wilfork. All 6'2 or under. Exceptions have to be Ngata and Kris Jenkins.

BJ Raji, is a little over 6'2, but not quite 6'3.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.