It's funny. Both Stampede and Korb followed similar paths. Shaky starts to their season, but had convincing victories towards the end of the regular season and stormed through the playoffs.
I have to make it well-known that Rohrheim ended up taking the hardest route possible in the playoffs. There was no easy road for us being at the #4 seed.
Do most of the teams in Zeta have the majority of their players boosting next season or even all players..? Im sure some of you wont answer...its cool though, just curious
Originally posted by coreyls18 yeah actually it is close. Our top teams are better than alphas top teams. Are bad teams are worse than alphas bad teams. Wrong. Your top team is better than alphas top team (singular). Besides that, alpha > zeta, and it isn't close. Alpha went 50-16 against Zeta between the interconference games and scrimmages. If you think alpha took them seriously and zeta didn't then you are quite obtuse.
Again, Alpha won 50 games against Zeta this season, and only 16 in reverse. Give me any statistic to back up your claim of the top teams being better besides the Stampede beating the Jacks.
Additionally, since you said that the top teams in Zeta are better than their counterparts in Alpha, I decided to check out the scrimmage results from only playoff teams. That is, the playoff teams scrimmaged the other playoff teams that were eliminated at roughly the same point they were. In these games, Alpha won 14 while Zeta took 4. However, the Valhala win today was pretty much guaranteed so we'll negate that and say it was a 13-4 win by Alpha. That number includes the championship game as well btw.
Originally posted by DiegoKokomo Originally posted by coreyls18
yeah actually it is close. Our top teams are better than alphas top teams. Are bad teams are worse than alphas bad teams. Wrong. Your top team is better than alphas top team (singular). Besides that, alpha > zeta, and it isn't close. Alpha went 50-16 against Zeta between the interconference games and scrimmages. If you think alpha took them seriously and zeta didn't then you are quite obtuse.
Again, Alpha won 50 games against Zeta this season, and only 16 in reverse. Give me any statistic to back up your claim of the top teams being better besides the Stampede beating the Jacks.
Everyone always talks about how dominant the AFC is, and how great the Patriots were for being 18-0 of the best conference. Well, they lost to the NFC Giants, 18-1 baby, the only thing that really matters in the end is who won the super bowl. In 10 years when people talk about the 2007/08 season, will anyone talk about how great the AFC was, or will they talk about the Champion Giants?
"We are A TON better than you in ways you can't prove!!!"
2 seasons, 2 championships, and our top 6 teams will be top 8 teams next season. If Bari gets back to where they were, we'll have 9 teams in this division who are competing for the top seed.
None of that matters though. What matters is the championship record. Our #4 seed beat your #1.
God bless America. Zeta did what no one in Alpha could; beat the WuJacks.
Originally posted by ArthurRiot DiegoKokomo can cry a lot, can't he?
"We are A TON better than you in ways you can't prove!!!"
2 seasons, 2 championships, and our top 6 teams will be top 8 teams next season. If Bari gets back to where they were, we'll have 9 teams in this division who are competing for the top seed.
None of that matters though. What matters is the championship record. Our #4 seed beat your #1.
God bless America. Zeta did what no one in Alpha could; beat the WuJacks.