Warrior General Games

I am OC for a team that has a solid lvl 62 QB right now with 50 in stamina. We are one of the top teams in our League this season and are going all out to win the League Championship this season. I can possible add a friend QB, lvl 60, 46 Stamina if we want. Again, both have very solid builds and would perform well when they are called upon.

So, would having the two QB's rotating plays make our team better?

A. A lot better
B. Maybe a little better
C. Won't make you better at all
D. Probably makes your team worse.

What do you think?

Comments??

Thanks.

B.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
B.

I cant say I have experience at that level but I agree with Kenshinzen B with a possibilty at A . My 2 best statistical seasons were when I shared duties with another QB .

It won't make you worse....two QB systems can be successful at any level in GLB

The answer is A -- It definitely makes the team better because the cumulative morale penalties are spread around.

Thanks guys!

I'm a big advocate of the 2 QB system. Would love to see KOG get another QB in at Samao. Not only does your QB stay fresh throughout the game, the moral hits are split so your QB just plays better. Also, in a one QB system, you end up having to spend SPs to cap stamina, and 60 confidence just isn't enough and you have to rely really hard of FG. A two QB system allows the QBs to specialize more on SAs and attributes that are designed to make you better, not the ones that just make your QB play no so badly.

Originally posted by fishdan
The answer is A -- It definitely makes the team better because the cumulative morale penalties are spread around.

Moral is a 2-way dynamic in game, just like energy. Though you get half as many -moral plays, you also get half as many +moral plays.

As such, none of these awnsers are inherently true. It can be better, it can be worse. With 1 QB your more likely to have great games and bad games, with 2 QBs you are more likely to have a little more consistancy, though if your QB2<QB1 it may be for the worse.

If you are going with one QB, he's going to have to have 60 stamina and confidence at the very least.

Personally, my team has always done better with one.

A...if it is done right...

Originally posted by Tactical Genius
If you are going with one QB, he's going to have to have 60 stamina and confidence at the very least.

Personally, my team has always done better with one.

60 stamina = lolno...

Everyone who said A is correct.......it will make the team a lot better.

The biggest adversary to a QB are the morale hits he gets from the defense (snarl, growl, etc etc). It then means that the morale detriment is spread out over 2 players, instead of one.

Originally posted by Tactical Genius
If you are going with one QB, he's going to have to have 60 stamina and confidence at the very least.

Personally, my team has always done better with one.

lmao

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
60 stamina = lolno...

Read no further. If this man says no then that is the right answer.

3 strong QB's is a great system. fresh guys all game. great arms

Originally posted by Padre97
Read no further. If this man says no then that is the right answer.

I thought you were getting smart with me, but then I remembered that your lock's buddy.

So well put.