User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pacific Pro League > Southeast Asia Conference > lol, The play that ended our season
Page:
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=590152&pbp_id=14823869

Oh well, it was a good run, we played well in that game too, we were just starting to get our shit worked out too.. oh well
 
Pirate23
offline
Link
 
why did you have the qb run it? stupid
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Pirate23
why did you have the qb run it? stupid


Its not like we rush ever.. just a sim thing
Edited by Mad Cow on Jul 17, 2009 10:17:49
 
Link
 
shoulda token boosted rick blaine
 
kurieg
offline
Link
 
Good 1st season, Winona, imo.

Although, I'm going to go with 7 blockers vs. a 4 man rush being the real issue in that play
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kurieg
Good 1st season, Winona, imo.

Although, I'm going to go with 7 blockers vs. a 4 man rush being the real issue in that play


Rick blaine is better when he is not on his ass... protect him and we are in most games...
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
our Wrs are pretty damn good.. hard to cover everything we throw out there if we can protect Blaine
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
We will be ready to take charge on SEA Pro next season.


lol anyone whos team is gutting PM me cheap plug
 
Link
 
I would suggest taking any play that only has 2 WRs out of the playbook.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
I would suggest taking any play that only has 2 WRs out of the playbook.


<--------- #2 passing team in Naga, we know what we are doing but thanks
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Mad Cow
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks

I would suggest taking any play that only has 2 WRs out of the playbook.


<--------- #2 passing team in Naga, we know what we are doing but thanks


^
I
I
I
I
I

Lost because the QB fumbled trying to scramble because the two receivers were both heavily covered.

I'm not so sure you know what you're doing, and you're welcome.
 
Snaza
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
Originally posted by Mad Cow

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks


I would suggest taking any play that only has 2 WRs out of the playbook.


<--------- #2 passing team in Naga, we know what we are doing but thanks


^
I
I
I
I
I

Lost because the QB fumbled trying to scramble because the two receivers were both heavily covered.

I'm not so sure you know what you're doing, and you're welcome.


Mad Cow's right... We do, don't worry.
I've already strung my OC up and whipped him for it...
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Snaza
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks

Originally posted by Mad Cow


Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks



I would suggest taking any play that only has 2 WRs out of the playbook.


<--------- #2 passing team in Naga, we know what we are doing but thanks


^
I
I
I
I
I

Lost because the QB fumbled trying to scramble because the two receivers were both heavily covered.

I'm not so sure you know what you're doing, and you're welcome.


Mad Cow's right... We do, don't worry.
I've already strung my OC up and whipped him for it...

and your QB
 
Snaza
offline
Link
 
He just wanted to win... what's he gonna do? Throw the ball into quadruple coverage? Get sacked? Or run with it...
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Snaza
He just wanted to win... what's he gonna do? Throw the ball into quadruple coverage? Get sacked? Or run with it...


our WR would have caught it...
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.