Is there a thread that details the exact Out of Position penalties for particular positions?
westy
offline
offline
The exact levels are unknown, but I do remember hearing something by Bort that said any position to QB is the biggest penalty and i think it was in the ball park of 30-40%.
Serg2108
offline
offline
Doh, I was hoping there was one.
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by Serg2108
Doh, I was hoping there was one.
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
I've played the following OOP and didn't notice any massive penalties:
FS at CB
CB at FS
TE at FB
FB at TE
HB at FB
DT at DE
SS at OLB
DE at OLB
C at G
C at OT
I DID notice what appeared to be a rather stiff penalty when playing WR at either FB or HB, though.
Doh, I was hoping there was one.
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
I've played the following OOP and didn't notice any massive penalties:
FS at CB
CB at FS
TE at FB
FB at TE
HB at FB
DT at DE
SS at OLB
DE at OLB
C at G
C at OT
I DID notice what appeared to be a rather stiff penalty when playing WR at either FB or HB, though.
StatlerandWaldorf
offline
offline
I PM'd support a few seasons ago about it.
They never gave exact %, but said it was close to 10% for similar positions, such as FS/CB.
The %'s were said to increase when crossing over to positions that weren't similar.
They never gave exact %, but said it was close to 10% for similar positions, such as FS/CB.
The %'s were said to increase when crossing over to positions that weren't similar.
aurora9132
offline
offline
Originally posted by Forbin
Originally posted by Serg2108
Doh, I was hoping there was one.
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
I've played the following OOP and didn't notice any massive penalties:
FS at CB
CB at FS
TE at FB
FB at TE
HB at FB
DT at DE
SS at OLB
DE at OLB
C at G
C at OT
I DID notice what appeared to be a rather stiff penalty when playing WR at either FB or HB, though.
This is about as good as it gets. Anything outside of this will be pushing a larger penalty. I have used most of these and notice nothing obvious.
Originally posted by Serg2108
Doh, I was hoping there was one.
Makes sense to penalize the QB the most I guess but tbh I wasn't interested in the wildcat but more in stuff like FB in for a TE and safeties for corners...stuff like that
I wonder if there is a way to test it?
I've played the following OOP and didn't notice any massive penalties:
FS at CB
CB at FS
TE at FB
FB at TE
HB at FB
DT at DE
SS at OLB
DE at OLB
C at G
C at OT
I DID notice what appeared to be a rather stiff penalty when playing WR at either FB or HB, though.
This is about as good as it gets. Anything outside of this will be pushing a larger penalty. I have used most of these and notice nothing obvious.
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by TD2Joe
How about TE to WR?
Oh yeah. I've used TE at WR5 before, and it worked decently also. I'm sure that's a minor penalty. It makes sense.
How about TE to WR?
Oh yeah. I've used TE at WR5 before, and it worked decently also. I'm sure that's a minor penalty. It makes sense.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
