Warrior General Games

Last season we had 67 players on our team.
We had 13 boost game 1 or before, another 7 boosted game 2 so we had 20 boosted by game 3.
Then we had 35 or so boost by game 10 giving us 57 boosted by mid season. Then for the playoffs we had 7 remaining boost. (3 players didnt boost at all)

So the saying about boosting early means you fail is total BS, just don't boost the entire team early. Record speaks for itself, also the 4 playoff games had boosters on the other teams who waited and here were the results:
05/28/2009 Fargo Community College Timberwolves W 111-10
05/30/2009 Golden Hill Mini Bones W 126-0
06/01/2009 Houston Headhunters W 87-14
06/03/2009 Chico's Bail Bonds Bears W 104-21

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?season=9&team_id=6898

Bottom line is you can boost early and win and whiskey and coke is the bomb

Originally posted by LordEvil
Last season we had 67 players on our team.
We had 13 boost game 1 or before, another 7 boosted game 2 so we had 20 boosted by game 3.
Then we had 35 or so boost by game 10 giving us 57 boosted by mid season. Then for the playoffs we had 7 remaining boost. (3 players didnt boost at all)

So the saying about boosting early means you fail is total BS, just don't boost the entire team early. Record speaks for itself, also the 4 playoff games had boosters on the other teams who waited and here were the results:
05/28/2009 Fargo Community College Timberwolves W 111-10
05/30/2009 Golden Hill Mini Bones W 126-0
06/01/2009 Houston Headhunters W 87-14
06/03/2009 Chico's Bail Bonds Bears W 104-21

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?season=9&team_id=6898

Bottom line is you can boost early and win and whiskey and coke is the bomb




agreed that whiskey drinks are da bomb.

Let it go LE...we all know you had a great year last season. And its funny seeing you come up with new ways to tell us over and over again.

so boosting creates greatness?!?LOL

...boosting makes up for lack of greatness imo!<.<

Originally posted by Booth Inc.
Let it go LE...we all know you had a great year last season. And its funny seeing you come up with new ways to tell us over and over again.

Naw, that isnt it, just tired of reading the same old if you boost early you fail in each team forum over and over again, when it isn't true.

Originally posted by LordEvil
Originally posted by Booth Inc.

Let it go LE...we all know you had a great year last season. And its funny seeing you come up with new ways to tell us over and over again.

Naw, that isnt it, just tired of reading the same old if you boost early you fail in each team forum over and over again, when it isn't true.

It kinda is true though for teams that have no depth.

Originally posted by Booth Inc.
Originally posted by LordEvil

Originally posted by Booth Inc.


Let it go LE...we all know you had a great year last season. And its funny seeing you come up with new ways to tell us over and over again.

Naw, that isnt it, just tired of reading the same old if you boost early you fail in each team forum over and over again, when it isn't true.

It kinda is true though for teams that have no depth.

True, thats key to it working. I miss the unlimited roster

Originally posted by LordEvil
Originally posted by Booth Inc.

Originally posted by LordEvil


Originally posted by Booth Inc.



Let it go LE...we all know you had a great year last season. And its funny seeing you come up with new ways to tell us over and over again.

Naw, that isnt it, just tired of reading the same old if you boost early you fail in each team forum over and over again, when it isn't true.

It kinda is true though for teams that have no depth.

True, thats key to it working. I miss the unlimited roster

Now you can't have an entire roster of centers.

Well this one team has the right Idea, I think this is the best way of forming a special teams. The Centers is what we used last season based off of their natural strength, they just make better special teamers. I wonder how well they can tackle though. Could play them on both sides of special teams maybe.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/roster.pl?team_id=7682

Originally posted by LordEvil
Well this one team has the right Idea, I think this is the best way of forming a special teams. The Centers is what we used last season based off of their natural strength, they just make better special teamers. I wonder how well they can tackle though. Could play them on both sides of special teams maybe.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/roster.pl?team_id=7682

<an... They hit the roster count perfectly, but I fail to see the real point of this. You cut back on other positions just for center-mania?

They are selling out on the running game going with 1 WR so you do have a point. I guess from a defensive standpoint you would blitz everyone all game long assigning the LOLB and FS to the flats and the ROLB and SS to the other flat and have the 2 outside CBs Blitz . Using a 3-4 and keeping the inside Lbs close to the LOS

Originally posted by LordEvil
They are selling out on the running game going with 1 WR so you do have a point. I guess from a defensive standpoint you would blitz everyone all game long assigning the LOLB and FS to the flats and the ROLB and SS to the other flat and have the 2 outside CBs Blitz . Using a 3-4 and keeping the inside Lbs close to the LOS

Either they're selling out the rush game, or that WR had better have the best damn build that the Pee Wees have ever seen.

Originally posted by LordEvil
Last season we had 67 players on our team.
We had 13 boost game 1 or before, another 7 boosted game 2 so we had 20 boosted by game 3.
Then we had 35 or so boost by game 10 giving us 57 boosted by mid season. Then for the playoffs we had 7 remaining boost. (3 players didnt boost at all)

So the saying about boosting early means you fail is total BS, just don't boost the entire team early. Record speaks for itself, also the 4 playoff games had boosters on the other teams who waited and here were the results:
05/28/2009 Fargo Community College Timberwolves W 111-10
05/30/2009 Golden Hill Mini Bones W 126-0
06/01/2009 Houston Headhunters W 87-14
06/03/2009 Chico's Bail Bonds Bears W 104-21

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?season=9&team_id=6898


Bottom line is you can boost early and win and whiskey and coke is the bomb



you are mostly right! You can boost early and win if you have good agents and good gm's, without a solid gameplan in place boosting early will fail you in the end!

Originally posted by freebird109
Originally posted by LordEvil

They are selling out on the running game going with 1 WR so you do have a point. I guess from a defensive standpoint you would blitz everyone all game long assigning the LOLB and FS to the flats and the ROLB and SS to the other flat and have the 2 outside CBs Blitz . Using a 3-4 and keeping the inside Lbs close to the LOS

Either they're selling out the rush game, or that WR had better have the best damn build that the Pee Wees have ever seen.

That WR has the best damn build the pee wees have ever seen

Originally posted by freebird109
Originally posted by LordEvil

Well this one team has the right Idea, I think this is the best way of forming a special teams. The Centers is what we used last season based off of their natural strength, they just make better special teamers. I wonder how well they can tackle though. Could play them on both sides of special teams maybe.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/roster.pl?team_id=7682

<an... They hit the roster count perfectly, but I fail to see the real point of this. You cut back on other positions just for center-mania?

Sure, if the centers are your ST, you are saving your O/Ds stamina, and there are a few useless positions on a pee wee team, punter is a good example.

Originally posted by lordevil

They are selling out on the running game going with 1 WR so you do have a point. I guess from a defensive standpoint you would blitz everyone all game long assigning the LOLB and FS to the flats and the ROLB and SS to the other flat and have the 2 outside CBs Blitz . Using a 3-4 and keeping the inside Lbs close to the LOS

Its harder to stop then you think