Which is better for sacks, speed or agility?
Madd_Maxx
offline
offline
I presume you are referring to DE's, most will say agility, I prefer speed...but either way you will need a good combination of both. One without the other is worthless.
Seleni
offline
offline
Originally posted by Madd_Maxx
I presume you are referring to DE's, most will say agility, I prefer speed...but either way you will need a good combination of both. One without the other is worthless.
I would say the opposite. I think most people like speed, I prefer agility.
But I agree the truth is you need both. But Max has been around longer so I will not say he is wrong.
But simply looking for sacks is not good. Build your guy to help the team win, and let everyhting else take care of it self, sacks will help, but to only think of that is wrong.
I presume you are referring to DE's, most will say agility, I prefer speed...but either way you will need a good combination of both. One without the other is worthless.
I would say the opposite. I think most people like speed, I prefer agility.
But I agree the truth is you need both. But Max has been around longer so I will not say he is wrong.
But simply looking for sacks is not good. Build your guy to help the team win, and let everyhting else take care of it self, sacks will help, but to only think of that is wrong.
TheInstantClassic
offline
offline
Honestly...They're one in the same.....Agility helps you get up to your potential speed, as well as other things.
But you need the actual speed to get up to it..Either way your answer is both..Both areas needs to be high for sacks.
But you need the actual speed to get up to it..Either way your answer is both..Both areas needs to be high for sacks.
Edited by TheInstantClassic on Jun 19, 2009 21:03:27
Underdawg08
offline
offline
Originally posted by TheInstantClassic
Honestly...They're one in the same.....
actually you could have 50 speed and 130 agility and get sacks.
if you had 130 speed and 50 agility you would probably never, ever get one.
Just food for thought.
Honestly...They're one in the same.....
actually you could have 50 speed and 130 agility and get sacks.
if you had 130 speed and 50 agility you would probably never, ever get one.
Just food for thought.
Edited by UnderDogs on Jun 20, 2009 04:56:34
TheInstantClassic
offline
offline
Yea..You could have 50 speed and 130 agility..But it wouldn't be as effective...And btw....50 isn't high for agility 
..We're talking close to 100's for both
..We're talking close to 100's for both Edited by TheInstantClassic on Jun 20, 2009 04:27:46
Edited by TheInstantClassic on Jun 20, 2009 04:27:31
Underdawg08
offline
offline
Originally posted by TheInstantClassic
Yea..You could have 50 speed and 130 agility..But it wouldn't be as effective...And btw....50 isn't high for agility..We're talking close to 100's for both
I think you completely misunderstood what I was saying. edited previous post to help you out.
Yea..You could have 50 speed and 130 agility..But it wouldn't be as effective...And btw....50 isn't high for agility
..We're talking close to 100's for both I think you completely misunderstood what I was saying. edited previous post to help you out.
Edited by UnderDogs on Jun 20, 2009 04:57:04
Madd_Maxx
offline
offline
Originally posted by TheInstantClassic
Yea..You could have 50 speed and 130 agility..But it wouldn't be as effective...And btw....50 isn't high for agility..We're talking close to 100's for both
I think you would have much better success with 110 in one and 90 in the other rather than 100 and 100.
Yea..You could have 50 speed and 130 agility..But it wouldn't be as effective...And btw....50 isn't high for agility
..We're talking close to 100's for both I think you would have much better success with 110 in one and 90 in the other rather than 100 and 100.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
