Just wondering as to the thought on this. I think the 2nd is better except maybe against fast WR's going deep.
Are we really doing this again? Here is how the conversation goes:
Longhornfan1024: the second is better, here's why . . .
Someone else: but you need to be fast to keep up with fast receivers
LH1024: sure they have good speed, but their low agility prevents them from taking advantage of it, plus, they can't cut well; a cb with better agility will be able to cut well and get up to speed so that he doesn't get beat often
Other person: But Colon Grifter!!!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
This is probably the fourth or fifth post on this exact topic, and it always goes that way. The majority of agents think that 90/80 is better, but there is a minority who still believes that you need the higher speed.
Longhornfan1024: the second is better, here's why . . .
Someone else: but you need to be fast to keep up with fast receivers
LH1024: sure they have good speed, but their low agility prevents them from taking advantage of it, plus, they can't cut well; a cb with better agility will be able to cut well and get up to speed so that he doesn't get beat often
Other person: But Colon Grifter!!!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
This is probably the fourth or fifth post on this exact topic, and it always goes that way. The majority of agents think that 90/80 is better, but there is a minority who still believes that you need the higher speed.
LostPeon
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Are we really doing this again? Here is how the conversation goes:
Longhornfan1024: the second is better, here's why . . .
Someone else: but you need to be fast to keep up with fast receivers
LH1024: sure they have good speed, but their low agility prevents them from taking advantage of it, plus, they can't cut well; a cb with better agility will be able to cut well and get up to speed so that he doesn't get beat often
Other person: But Colon Grifter!!!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
This is probably the fourth or fifth post on this exact topic, and it always goes that way. The majority of agents think that 90/80 is better, but there is a minority who still believes that you need the higher speed.
+1
Are we really doing this again? Here is how the conversation goes:
Longhornfan1024: the second is better, here's why . . .
Someone else: but you need to be fast to keep up with fast receivers
LH1024: sure they have good speed, but their low agility prevents them from taking advantage of it, plus, they can't cut well; a cb with better agility will be able to cut well and get up to speed so that he doesn't get beat often
Other person: But Colon Grifter!!!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
This is probably the fourth or fifth post on this exact topic, and it always goes that way. The majority of agents think that 90/80 is better, but there is a minority who still believes that you need the higher speed.
+1
Granted86
offline
offline
Originally posted by Granted86
i love seeing agents who make 100 speed 60 agility CBs then play close/aggressive ... fails every time
i love seeing agents who make 100 speed 60 agility CBs then play close/aggressive ... fails every time
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by smeberen
Just wondering as to the thought on this. I think the 2nd is better except maybe against fast WR's going deep.
That's why you add in second capped jumping. If your fast enough to stay close, jumping (which is cheaper to spend in) makes up for a few of the steps the WR has on you.
Just wondering as to the thought on this. I think the 2nd is better except maybe against fast WR's going deep.
That's why you add in second capped jumping. If your fast enough to stay close, jumping (which is cheaper to spend in) makes up for a few of the steps the WR has on you.
Viscount
offline
offline
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
Zeromus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
60 agility is a bit low, but high Change Direction is godly
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
60 agility is a bit low, but high Change Direction is godly
Granted86
offline
offline
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
Viscount
offline
offline
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
Granted86
offline
offline
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would, maybe not 10x better, but it is ALOT better
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would, maybe not 10x better, but it is ALOT better
Last edited Apr 11, 2009 18:28:46
Viscount
offline
offline
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would
Agility is wayyyyyyyy overrated. The majority of the people who claim that CBs need agility close to speed don't actually watch CBs playing entire games all they do is look at the stats and/or watch the deflections.
If you actually watch CBs with varying speed:agility ratios and Change Direction amounts covering multiple different routes you'll understand what a CB does and does not need.
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would
Agility is wayyyyyyyy overrated. The majority of the people who claim that CBs need agility close to speed don't actually watch CBs playing entire games all they do is look at the stats and/or watch the deflections.
If you actually watch CBs with varying speed:agility ratios and Change Direction amounts covering multiple different routes you'll understand what a CB does and does not need.
Granted86
offline
offline
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would
Agility is wayyyyyyyy overrated. The majority of the people who claim that CBs need agility close to speed don't actually watch CBs playing entire games all they do is look at the stats and/or watch the deflections.
If you actually watch CBs with varying speed:agility ratios and Change Direction amounts covering multiple different routes you'll understand what a CB does and does not need.
agility is overrated? lmao honestly one of the dumbest things ive heard, and ur usually one of the smartest ppl on here viscount
i guess im the minority who watches every replay of a game, and really cares less and less about stats as the seasons go on. From watching replays i will tell you that 100 speed 70 agility CB will never be as effective as 90 speed 80 agility
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount
Call me crazy, but personally I think 100 speed, 60 agility and 10 Change Direction would be optimal.
90/80 with 10 CD would be 10x better
No that would not.
yes it would
Agility is wayyyyyyyy overrated. The majority of the people who claim that CBs need agility close to speed don't actually watch CBs playing entire games all they do is look at the stats and/or watch the deflections.
If you actually watch CBs with varying speed:agility ratios and Change Direction amounts covering multiple different routes you'll understand what a CB does and does not need.
agility is overrated? lmao honestly one of the dumbest things ive heard, and ur usually one of the smartest ppl on here viscount
i guess im the minority who watches every replay of a game, and really cares less and less about stats as the seasons go on. From watching replays i will tell you that 100 speed 70 agility CB will never be as effective as 90 speed 80 agility
merk
offline
offline
Arguing which was better last season is pointless.
Arguing which is better next season is fruitless.
Arguing which is better next season is fruitless.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
