Hustler's are going CPU if the I slam madness is not over next season.
TaintStick
offline
offline
there was no islam madness in the Super Wok. Are you planning on moving to another league?
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
do less whining and more forum searching plz.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
LaSeeno
offline
offline
Originally posted by sirallan
do less whining and more forum searching plz.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
Go fuck yourself bud.
do less whining and more forum searching plz.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
Go fuck yourself bud.
creeker22
offline
offline
Waxers and MEM used it. I am not going to use it for PDD, but do I have in issue with it. No, not that much. If they choose to play games that way then so be it. It isn't cheating, and you should know its coming since teams that use the S islam use it a lot throughout the season. Bring a full out blitz, and goalline defense the whole game. Shut that part down. You will win.
LaSeeno
offline
offline
Originally posted by creeker22
Waxers and MEM used it. I am not going to use it for PDD, but do I have in issue with it. No, not that much. If they choose to play games that way then so be it. It isn't cheating, and you should know its coming since teams that use the S islam use it a lot throughout the season. Bring a full out blitz, and goalline defense the whole game. Shut that part down. You will win.
It's not even about stopping it. It's just boring as hell to watch.
Waxers and MEM used it. I am not going to use it for PDD, but do I have in issue with it. No, not that much. If they choose to play games that way then so be it. It isn't cheating, and you should know its coming since teams that use the S islam use it a lot throughout the season. Bring a full out blitz, and goalline defense the whole game. Shut that part down. You will win.
It's not even about stopping it. It's just boring as hell to watch.
Originally posted by sirallan
do less whining and more forum searching plz.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
do less whining and more forum searching plz.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2412104
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
Originally posted by joe
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
With the "run a play to many times" and get negatively affected + the possibly of the D play creator I see A LOT of complaining from offensive coordinators. No longer can you run the same play 50 times because a)the 10th time you are going to get nerfed(example IDK if its actually 10) b)defensive coordinators can now spot it by putting 9 in the box.
Then again with the new leading the WR coming into play it might even out.
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
With the "run a play to many times" and get negatively affected + the possibly of the D play creator I see A LOT of complaining from offensive coordinators. No longer can you run the same play 50 times because a)the 10th time you are going to get nerfed(example IDK if its actually 10) b)defensive coordinators can now spot it by putting 9 in the box.
Then again with the new leading the WR coming into play it might even out.
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by joe
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
With the "run a play to many times" and get negatively affected + the possibly of the D play creator I see A LOT of complaining from offensive coordinators. No longer can you run the same play 50 times because a)the 10th time you are going to get nerfed(example IDK if its actually 10) b)defensive coordinators can now spot it by putting 9 in the box.
Then again with the new leading the WR coming into play it might even out.
So we will penalize Defense for blitzing the same guys on the same downs also? This whole negative affect is all premature to me. With the D creator coming out the negative affect should be hold off at least until the preseason is over. If not it is going to open a whole other can of worms.
Originally posted by joe
How much bitching do you think will be after this happens?
With the "run a play to many times" and get negatively affected + the possibly of the D play creator I see A LOT of complaining from offensive coordinators. No longer can you run the same play 50 times because a)the 10th time you are going to get nerfed(example IDK if its actually 10) b)defensive coordinators can now spot it by putting 9 in the box.
Then again with the new leading the WR coming into play it might even out.
So we will penalize Defense for blitzing the same guys on the same downs also? This whole negative affect is all premature to me. With the D creator coming out the negative affect should be hold off at least until the preseason is over. If not it is going to open a whole other can of worms.
Last edited Apr 6, 2009 12:51:44
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
Great point. Never heard anyone talk about a negative effect for the defense.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
LaSeeno
offline
offline
Originally posted by sirallan
Great point. Never heard anyone talk about a negative effect for the defense.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
IRL, you run the same play over and over the D smartens up. I think a system of deteriorating gains could work well.
Great point. Never heard anyone talk about a negative effect for the defense.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
IRL, you run the same play over and over the D smartens up. I think a system of deteriorating gains could work well.
Originally posted by LaSeeno
Originally posted by sirallan
Great point. Never heard anyone talk about a negative effect for the defense.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
IRL, you run the same play over and over the D smartens up. I think a system of deteriorating gains could work well.
I really don't agree with this 100% for the D gets smarter.
Originally posted by sirallan
Great point. Never heard anyone talk about a negative effect for the defense.
I just think that running the same run on first and second down 95% of the time is a little screwed up. Obviously there are ways you can slow it down and "stop" it but I think there needs to be some kind of negative effect.
But like you said with the D creator we might not need any thing else since we can now make a play.
IRL, you run the same play over and over the D smartens up. I think a system of deteriorating gains could work well.
I really don't agree with this 100% for the D gets smarter.
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
Originally posted by joe
I really don't agree with this 100% for the D gets smarter.
How so? If a defense knows exactly what the offense is going to do, 95% of the time they are going to shut it down.
I really don't agree with this 100% for the D gets smarter.
How so? If a defense knows exactly what the offense is going to do, 95% of the time they are going to shut it down.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























