do any of the formulas use it in their equation?
Bukowski
offline
offline
yeah, it actually can move up the receiving bar and/or the carrying bar, I've seen it do both, although it has more of an effect on the receiving bar.
magicalmrrich
offline
offline
Apparently in the receiving bar when the calculations are done (if this is correct) you multiply your receivers base jumping attribute by 0.15.
The current formula being banded around (which appears to be quite accurate) is
0.397 x Catching + 0.175 x Speed + 0.15 x Jumping + 0.14 x Agility + 0.137 x Vision
Remember, these are raw attributes, so equipment doesn't count in the scouting bars.
So jumping seems to be the third most important attribute in this game for receiving.
The current formula being banded around (which appears to be quite accurate) is
0.397 x Catching + 0.175 x Speed + 0.15 x Jumping + 0.14 x Agility + 0.137 x Vision
Remember, these are raw attributes, so equipment doesn't count in the scouting bars.
So jumping seems to be the third most important attribute in this game for receiving.
magicalmrrich
offline
offline
Thing is, you have to look at this and think, if the receiving bar is very high but your overall is lower, does this make him a better "receiver" rather than a better overall player?
If these formulas do run true I did a little experiment. Now if a high level receiver spends his SP correctly he should be able to get his receiver to the following caps easily:
Speed - 68
Agility - 68
Catching - 68
Jumping - 61
Vision - 61
If you run the math on the player above, he will have a receiving score of 65.923
Now, according to the sums, the least important stat is vision. So let's say you only take vision to 49 and use the SP saved to get catching to 74...
Receiver score - 66.661
Would this actually make him a better receiver though? Who knows.
If these formulas do run true I did a little experiment. Now if a high level receiver spends his SP correctly he should be able to get his receiver to the following caps easily:
Speed - 68
Agility - 68
Catching - 68
Jumping - 61
Vision - 61
If you run the math on the player above, he will have a receiving score of 65.923
Now, according to the sums, the least important stat is vision. So let's say you only take vision to 49 and use the SP saved to get catching to 74...
Receiver score - 66.661
Would this actually make him a better receiver though? Who knows.
FBGProfessor
offline
offline
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
Viscount
offline
offline
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
Why would it be hard to know? Equipment doesn't make a good build, your attributes do.
I bet at least 90% of the well built WRs in GLB have their equipment in speed and most will have 10+ VPs in Track Star.
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
Why would it be hard to know? Equipment doesn't make a good build, your attributes do.
I bet at least 90% of the well built WRs in GLB have their equipment in speed and most will have 10+ VPs in Track Star.
zomgmike
offline
offline
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
Drawman
offline
offline
Originally posted by zomgmike
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
Darrick213
offline
offline
Originally posted by Drawman
Originally posted by zomgmike
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
it really is true tbh
Originally posted by zomgmike
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
it really is true tbh
zomgmike
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darrick213
Originally posted by Drawman
Originally posted by zomgmike
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
it really is true tbh
the only values displayed are multiples of 3
Originally posted by Drawman
Originally posted by zomgmike
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
and it doesnt help that the bars are rounded to the nearest 3, quite inaccurate imo
This is not true. Only for team scouting if I'm correct.
it really is true tbh
the only values displayed are multiples of 3
drakeborn
offline
offline
Originally posted by FBGProfessor
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
Of course there is a correlation, considering most of the attributes that go in to the scouting bar are attributes that we know improve receivers. It isn't a perfect correlation but there is a relationship.
Since these formulas and the bars do not take into account EQ or VPs, it is really hard to know how they correlate, if at all, to a good build.
Of course there is a correlation, considering most of the attributes that go in to the scouting bar are attributes that we know improve receivers. It isn't a perfect correlation but there is a relationship.
tautology
offline
offline
Originally posted by mrmattregan
and carrying does nothing... sort of surprising on that one...
Carrying does affect overall, catching and carrying bar...but very litte.
Also, jumping affect catching and overall bar...though very little fwiw.
and carrying does nothing... sort of surprising on that one...
Carrying does affect overall, catching and carrying bar...but very litte.
Also, jumping affect catching and overall bar...though very little fwiw.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























