I know this is not a popular idea and contrary to the common wisdom of how to build a LB, but I'm interested in trying out something different with a LB. However, I'm still ironing out the strategy for developing this type of LB and would certainly be interested in input.
I have three general outlines and possibilities for building this type of LB...but the goal for all is the same...build a true, hard-hitting LB... a guy, mostly likely playing in the middle, that is truly built to counter the power back and bloody people's noses.
Here are my ideas:
1) The strong and agile LB....he would be built similar to a NT, with greatest focus on strength, agility, and tackling, and most (if not all) of his equipment in strength. The way I would anticipate doign this is by first taking sterength and agility to at least 60, (while training speed/tackling), and then taking tackling and speed to at least 48. This type of build sacrifices speed in favor of strength. In effect, this type of player would serve as a 5th DLineman, good at shedding blocks close to the line, but would struggle in the open field and would not be very good at chasing down runs to the outside.
2) a "combo" LB. by this I mean a strong, but also somewhat fast (though less quick) guy... for this type of player I might first take strength and speed to 60 while training agiltiy and tackling. Then I could take agility and tackling to 48. not sure where equipment might go, but I would lean towards some sort of strength/speed combination. This player would look more like a safety but a lot stronger and less agile...could probably reasonable chase people down in the open field and hit them hard, but would probably have a hard time shedding blocks because of his relatively low agility.
3) the purest hard hitting build... this LB would start off by taking strength and tackling to 60 while training up speed and agility. speed and agility would then be taken to 48. all equipment would go into strength or some sort of strength/tackling combination. This player would obviously not be good at chasing players down but would pack a mean wallop when he does get in on the tackle.
so if you guys have any constructive thoughts about any of these approaches, I'd certainly be interested to hear what you have to say.
I have three general outlines and possibilities for building this type of LB...but the goal for all is the same...build a true, hard-hitting LB... a guy, mostly likely playing in the middle, that is truly built to counter the power back and bloody people's noses.
Here are my ideas:
1) The strong and agile LB....he would be built similar to a NT, with greatest focus on strength, agility, and tackling, and most (if not all) of his equipment in strength. The way I would anticipate doign this is by first taking sterength and agility to at least 60, (while training speed/tackling), and then taking tackling and speed to at least 48. This type of build sacrifices speed in favor of strength. In effect, this type of player would serve as a 5th DLineman, good at shedding blocks close to the line, but would struggle in the open field and would not be very good at chasing down runs to the outside.
2) a "combo" LB. by this I mean a strong, but also somewhat fast (though less quick) guy... for this type of player I might first take strength and speed to 60 while training agiltiy and tackling. Then I could take agility and tackling to 48. not sure where equipment might go, but I would lean towards some sort of strength/speed combination. This player would look more like a safety but a lot stronger and less agile...could probably reasonable chase people down in the open field and hit them hard, but would probably have a hard time shedding blocks because of his relatively low agility.
3) the purest hard hitting build... this LB would start off by taking strength and tackling to 60 while training up speed and agility. speed and agility would then be taken to 48. all equipment would go into strength or some sort of strength/tackling combination. This player would obviously not be good at chasing players down but would pack a mean wallop when he does get in on the tackle.
so if you guys have any constructive thoughts about any of these approaches, I'd certainly be interested to hear what you have to say.






























