Warrior General Games

Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

I'm definitely looking forward to seeing how this works. My WR has 6 Quick Cut and 65 agi, maybe increase his production? Either way it's a good deal.

It'll be interesting to see how this works. It's a good addition though, because it felt like straight up man D for corners was a little too successful and easy to pull off. I'm not sure I'm going to do it with my receiver yet though. In the post, he said it was bad for low agility guys...I'm not sure what that means or if my agility is low relative to what he is thinking. I'll probably test it out in some scrimmages though.

I also like the update to QB's vision check that has him throwing to other receivers before the primary route develops if they are open. I'm the 5th string WR on my team, so maybe that's why .

I was hoping for a slider rather than just two choices...

Route Running Style
Exact: run the routes exactly as drawn up
Creative: try to use juke type moves early in the route to get away from defenders (requires high agility)

I wonder what is considered "high" agility.

I'm wondering if/how these "juke type moves" relate to the Head Fake and Juke SA's. I'd assume they would work better the higher these SA's are, but thats just a guess....I also wonder if making these moves slows a WR down a little bit while running the route....

Originally posted by Sik Wit It
It'll be interesting to see how this works. It's a good addition though, because it felt like straight up man D for corners was a little too successful and easy to pull off. I'm not sure I'm going to do it with my receiver yet though. In the post, he said it was bad for low agility guys...I'm not sure what that means or if my agility is low relative to what he is thinking. I'll probably test it out in some scrimmages though.

I also like the update to QB's vision check that has him throwing to other receivers before the primary route develops if they are open. I'm the 5th string WR on my team, so maybe that's why .

As it always applies, he means low agility compared to what your defender requires to keep up with you. It's not like you have to have 70+ agility every time to pull it off, but if you have 50 agility and your defender has 40 your chances are probably low.

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio
Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by Jack Del Rio

Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

I very much doubt he has low speed.

Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio


Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

I very much doubt he has low speed.

is 69 speed low for a receiver? be honest.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by Jack Del Rio

Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

I don't get it, how is that not a horrible example?
It actually makes sense in a non-sarcastic way.

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio


Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

I don't get it, how is that not a horrible example?
It actually makes sense in a non-sarcastic way.

lol

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by Jack Del Rio

Originally posted by UnderDogs


Originally posted by Jack Del Rio



Anyone going to try this out? I think it'd finally give some value to those horrible high agility low speed WRs that are out there doing nothing up to this point.

Yeah low speed high agility receivers fucking suck. what is this guy thinking.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179463

I don't get it, how is that not a horrible example?
It actually makes sense in a non-sarcastic way.

lol

not funny. It called pump some SA such as FS,QC, and HF and you have a deadly receiver CB. Max Speed isn't everything. But that my opinion not yours.

That guy's build is closed, how do we know you're not just making stuff up?

Originally posted by harshmellow
That guy's build is closed, how do we know you're not just making stuff up?

If there anything that I hate is when people like you have to question ever single detail in a situation which doesn't require it. So for harshmellow sake I took a pic of my build yesterday.

http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/arcbee007/Proof.jpg

As you can see my previous post stated that High Agility players can become effective. My build doesn't reflect that. Yet it still doesn't say I don't believe that high agility (low speed) WR's with decently high SA's will make a impact.Also it not like new members will copy players are going to even copy this so that why I'm posting it. Also if anyone has questions about SA's you can look back at a few of my games because I remember there being a few plays involving a ton of SA's going off. Just forget the game, so your going to need to go looking.