In your mind who had the best offseason so far?
12thKnight
offline
offline
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
12thKnight
offline
offline
Originally posted by captainsexy
Monkey's
/Thread
I don't agree. I would put Kalamazoo and several other teams over the Monkeys.
Monkey's
/Thread
I don't agree. I would put Kalamazoo and several other teams over the Monkeys.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
Deuceswild26
offline
offline
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Originally posted by captainsexy
Monkey's
/Thread
I don't agree. I would put Kalamazoo and several other teams over the Monkeys.
This man speaks the truth.
Originally posted by captainsexy
Monkey's
/Thread
I don't agree. I would put Kalamazoo and several other teams over the Monkeys.
This man speaks the truth.
Romeorr
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
its easy to say this in the offseason.
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
its easy to say this in the offseason.
coachviking
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
We have had a pretty stacked roster for years. Basically the same numbers and no bitching, so I'm betting on it being the same.
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Best offseason as far as improvement or best offseason as far as capturing famous players?
See, I think there's a difference. I think there's several teams that appear to have improved quite a bit over the offseason - Green Bay probably leading the list, the Continentals and Kalamazoo definitely in the mix, Minnesota in there too in the West. I haven't yet studied all the teams - I'm still working on bringing more players on, eleven starters isn't yet enough - but as far as return on investment I think several teams beat Monmouth and HHW. Most significant is Green Bay and the Continentals adding coordinator talent. At some point it's not who you have but what system you're running and how good your AI is. Maybe the Monkeys and Warriors got better, but I'm guessing not by much, and I think especially in the Monkeys' case there's going to be some trouble in Paradise if all of their rockstars aren't getting the full 100 XP per game.
Just my impressions, and they're premature, but hey, you asked.
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
We have had a pretty stacked roster for years. Basically the same numbers and no bitching, so I'm betting on it being the same.
PP
offline
offline
On paper, the Yotes had a hell of an off season. I haven't studied the additions yet, but I'm afraid that I won't like what I see....meaning they are as good as they look.
Edit for typo
Edit for typo
Last edited Dec 27, 2008 08:41:11
Greg B
offline
offline
12th there was a game where I got 30/100 XP and I didn't say a word, hell there were quite a few players that got that and they didn't complain.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greg Butler
12th there was a game where I got 30/100 XP and I didn't say a word, hell there were quite a few players that got that and they didn't complain.
You got 30/100 xp because we beat the Vaqueros so bad that our D never saw the field
12th there was a game where I got 30/100 XP and I didn't say a word, hell there were quite a few players that got that and they didn't complain.
You got 30/100 xp because we beat the Vaqueros so bad that our D never saw the field
quicksilver
offline
offline
The season hadn't started yet... So season 6 goes to Boston.
But as for off-season... Id have to say the Monkeys or the Maulers.
But as for off-season... Id have to say the Monkeys or the Maulers.
Derek1095
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
What a stupid thing to say, you better find a way to get us all 100 xp per game or else.... emmmmmmm.......... something really bad will happen!
Seriously though with the locker room (forum
) atmosphere there ain't a chance of any problems in Monmouth this year, roll on day 1 
All egos are checked at the door. Don't count on any bitching at all.
What a stupid thing to say, you better find a way to get us all 100 xp per game or else.... emmmmmmm.......... something really bad will happen!
Seriously though with the locker room (forum
) atmosphere there ain't a chance of any problems in Monmouth this year, roll on day 1 captainsexy
offline
offline
Originally posted by PP
On paper, the Yotes had a hell of an off season. I haven't studied the additions yet, but I'm afraid that I won't like what I see....meaning they are as good as they look.
Edit for typo
We've had a pretty good offseason.
Just need to fill out the rest of the depth before we're contenders.
On paper, the Yotes had a hell of an off season. I haven't studied the additions yet, but I'm afraid that I won't like what I see....meaning they are as good as they look.
Edit for typo
We've had a pretty good offseason.
Just need to fill out the rest of the depth before we're contenders.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
