User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Tactics Discussion > Many, but simple questions to answer about cover 1,2,3,4,0
Canadaleaf
offline
Link
 
ok guys got many questions but they are simple to answer. I have read satcho guide(spelling)

All the questions branch off so ya. If you have input as well to leave please do.

1)They have 2wr set and te. How many can i blitz in a cover (blank) set so the te is covered and not left wide open?formation is 4-3
a)Cover 0
b)Cover1
c)cover2
d)cover3
e)cover 4

They have a 3 wr set with te. How many can i blitz in a cover (blank) set so that the te is covered also and not left wide open? formation is 4-2-5 nickle(3cb)
a)cover 0
b)cover 1
c)cover 2
d)cover 3
e)cover 4

3)should i blitz cb's? and if yes, during what covers and what one?

heres an easy template you can use for the questions:

1.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
2.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
3)

thanks guys im just not smart with defense, but great with offense.
 
RAPB
offline
Link
 
I assume, you play man under coverage and want everyone covered underneath too.

1.
a) (check out how they line up; you can blitz one of the two guys doubleing a receiver)

b) FS (but then no deep coverage), LOLB orSS (the other one got the TE), MLB and/or ROLB - they both got the HB - so you can blitz one (or both and gamble on the RB staying to block)

c) FS + SS (but then no deep coverage), MLB and/or ROLB - they both got the HB - so you can blitz one (or both and gamble on the RB staying to block)

d) the 3 deep and (probably) a OLB?

e) noone - exept the 4 deep, for 4 deep + 4 lineman leaves 3 guys to cover 3 receivers and a RB

2.

a) (check out how they line up; you can blitz one of the two guys doubleing a receiver)

b) FS (but then no deep coverage), LOLB orSS (the other one got the TE), MLB got the HB - so you can gamble on the RB staying to block

c) FS + SS (but then no deep coverage), MLB got the HB - so you can gamble on the RB staying to block

d) noone - except the 3 deep, for 3 deep + 4 lineman leaves 4 guys to cover 4 receivers and a RB

e) noone - exept the 4 deep, for 4 deep + 4 lineman leaves 3 guys to cover 4 receivers and a RB

3) Find out yourself what works or doesn't.
Last edited Oct 13, 2008 11:44:03
 
Canadaleaf
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RAPB
I assume, you play man under coverage and want everyone covered underneath too.

1.
a) (check out how they line up; you can blitz one of the two guys doubleing a receiver)

b) FS (but then no deep coverage), LOLB orSS (the other one got the TE), MLB and/or ROLB - they both got the HB - so you can blitz one (or both and gamble on the RB staying to block)

c) FS + SS (but then no deep coverage), MLB and/or ROLB - they both got the HB - so you can blitz one (or both and gamble on the RB staying to block)

d) the 3 deep and (probably) a OLB?

e) noone - exept the 4 deep, for 4 deep + 4 lineman leaves 3 guys to cover 4 receivers and a RB

2.

a) (check out how they line up; you can blitz one of the two guys doubleing a receiver)

b) FS (but then no deep coverage), LOLB orSS (the other one got the TE), MLB got the HB - so you can gamble on the RB staying to block

c) FS + SS (but then no deep coverage), MLB got the HB - so you can gamble on the RB staying to block

d) noone - except the 3 deep, for 3 deep + 4 lineman leaves 4 guys to cover 4 receivers and a RB

e) noone - exept the 4 deep, for 4 deep + 4 lineman leaves 3 guys to cover 4 receivers and a RB

3) Find out yourself what works or doesn't.


thanks mate, you have been a huge huge HUGE help!
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.