User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Tactics Discussion > two question regrading QB vision and the AI
tragula
title
offline
Link
 
1) I know that setting a primary target from the AI, will increase the change that the QB will force the pass.
Do anyone now how the vision effect this? Ie how much vision the QB need to be able to see a second target ? a third target ? and so on.

2) I seen some claim that setting the play length (short/mid/long) changes the way the HB/FB align on the field both on run/pass play. Has anyone checked this and have clear evidence whether this is truth or some of the junk running around ?
 
Forbin
offline
Link
 
1) I honestly don't see this happening that often. With a decently built QB, he's always going to throw to the "most open" guy, if he has any time at all to throw. Maybe if a QB had like 25 vision, setting the favorite targets would have more impact.

2) 100% false. I'm not providing evidence. Spend the same hours my teams spent testing and finally concluding that it's a BS theory, like many others.
 
Gyuri1
offline
Link
 
I agree with Forbin on both points, assuming that you are referring to the team AI (not individual QB tactics) in the first point. If you are referring to individual QB tactics, I've found that choosing favorite targets does cause forced passes at the early stages of a QB's development (it's less of a problem as the QB's vision gets higher, again, assuming that the QB has time to throw). The biggest cause of forced passes, from my perspective, is setting checkdowns to "never", but it has some real benefits as well.
 
tragula
title
offline
Link
 
Thanks for both answer.

I had a feeling that the play length thing is a nonsense, but had not the opportunity to check that myself.

 
OUTLAW77
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Forbin
1) I honestly don't see this happening that often. With a decently built QB, he's always going to throw to the "most open" guy, if he has any time at all to throw. Maybe if a QB had like 25 vision, setting the favorite targets would have more impact.

2) 100% false. I'm not providing evidence. Spend the same hours my teams spent testing and finally concluding that it's a BS theory, like many others.


+ 1
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.