While the Comets admittedly sucked during my tenure as owner. The Bruins have also choked every year in the playoffs after great regular seasons (no offense to the Bruins ownership or players). I think next seasons East is going to be as wide open as ever
Originally posted by theboss Originally posted by Henson o mito
and the western supremacy does not stop getting bigger
oh please, i beat chicago would woop any of u guys, and we spanked chatt, san fran, and houston in the 3 scrimmage games. No offense to you 3 teams =)
A win is a win but the Quarantine were playing it as a scrimmage, running settings we never had before. Still, i'd put the Tokers as one of the favorites to win the East. Bruins #1 definitely, but they need to find a way to win in the playoffs. Don't forget about Memphis though
Originally posted by sabresandkane While the Comets admittedly sucked during my tenure as owner. The Bruins have also choked every year in the playoffs after great regular seasons (no offense to the Bruins ownership or players). I think next seasons East is going to be as wide open as ever
If you want to consider us as chokers, feel free. I don't consider it choking though.
Season two, we faced the Memphis Ghetto Dawgs and the sim decided to run the same play, over and over again for a good portion of the game (FB dive on 7 of the first 8 rushing plays). Season three, we faced your team and got to experience how a build that doesn't make any sense, can totally dominate a game (don't really want to get into how much horseshit it is, to have a DE built like DB getting 40-60 sacks a season). Season four, we lost in OT, to very good team (who almost beat us in the regular season).
Admittedly, I think we got out-coached a bit vs Klamath. The other two seasons were total BS though.
Originally posted by Warlock Originally posted by sabresandkane
While the Comets admittedly sucked during my tenure as owner. The Bruins have also choked every year in the playoffs after great regular seasons (no offense to the Bruins ownership or players). I think next seasons East is going to be as wide open as ever
If you want to consider us as chokers, feel free. I don't consider it choking though.
Season two, we faced the Memphis Ghetto Dawgs and the sim decided to run the same play, over and over again for a good portion of the game (FB dive on 7 of the first 8 rushing plays). Season three, we faced your team and got to experience how a build that doesn't make any sense, can totally dominate a game (don't really want to get into how much horseshit it is, to have a DE built like DB getting 40-60 sacks a season). Season four, we lost in OT, to very good team (who almost beat us in the regular season).
Admittedly, I think we got out-coached a bit vs Klamath. The other two seasons were total BS though.
To tell you the truth Warlock, we had your offensive tactics pinned down within maximum 2 percentage points in that game, and I don't think the result would have been much different without Dee.
Originally posted by theboss Originally posted by Henson o mito
and the western supremacy does not stop getting bigger
oh please, i beat chicago would woop any of u guys, and we spanked chatt, san fran, and houston in the 3 scrimmage games. No offense to you 3 teams =)
We beat Chatt, San Fran, and Houston pretty handily as well. We also beat Chicago and Memphis in the season ending scrimmage games. Granted they were scrimmages, but it's the closest thing we have to compare at this point.
Reno beat Akron and Alby won the league title. That was the 2nd year in a row that a Western Conference team won the title...
Originally posted by cavalier Originally posted by Warlock
Originally posted by sabresandkane
While the Comets admittedly sucked during my tenure as owner. The Bruins have also choked every year in the playoffs after great regular seasons (no offense to the Bruins ownership or players). I think next seasons East is going to be as wide open as ever
If you want to consider us as chokers, feel free. I don't consider it choking though.
Season two, we faced the Memphis Ghetto Dawgs and the sim decided to run the same play, over and over again for a good portion of the game (FB dive on 7 of the first 8 rushing plays). Season three, we faced your team and got to experience how a build that doesn't make any sense, can totally dominate a game (don't really want to get into how much horseshit it is, to have a DE built like DB getting 40-60 sacks a season). Season four, we lost in OT, to very good team (who almost beat us in the regular season).
Admittedly, I think we got out-coached a bit vs Klamath. The other two seasons were total BS though.
To tell you the truth Warlock, we had your offensive tactics pinned down within maximum 2 percentage points in that game, and I don't think the result would have been much different without Dee.
Seriously... you're trying to tell me that a 6 sack (+5 hurries) performance, wouldn't have made a big difference in a 16 point game? I have to disagree, it was clear that Dee opened the flood gates. Once he got two sacks in the first drive (due to a retarded build), it destroyed our OL's confidence for the rest of the game. I believe the game would have been much different, without such an imbalanced player on the field... btw I'm not saying that we'd have won for sure, but at least the game would have been decided by the teams and not a single player.
Besides, how would you know what our game-plan was... after falling behind we were forced to pass almost 50 times by the sim.