User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > HB Club > Elusive Special Abilities
Tothehouse
offline
Link
 
Out of Headfake, Juke, and Spin.......which seems to be the most productive? I am hesitant to spend the points on Spin because I know very little about it even though I will have agility between 50-60 next level.

I have been working juke but havent completely comitted to it yet.
 
Dravz
offline
Link
 
Head Fake and Juke can be used in tight quarters somewhat, but Spin is more of an open-field ability. Watch your replays and see where you need the help, then invest in that SA.
 
Dudeamis
offline
Link
 
head fake is great when you don't have high agility yet, but juke is more effective once you have the agility to support it.
 
jbiller
offline
Link
 
If you plan to be a high speed / lower agility back, go all out in Head Fake. If you're balanced or more agility based I'd say go balanced between the two. Juke doesn't seem to help all that much, but Head Fake and Juke are simply amazing.
 
maddvirus
offline
Link
 
So how much does Head Fake work when you have the high agility? I'm gonna boost and get my HF to 6, with 54 agility, how much will this help out. I want to be a balanced back with my strength and vision up to 48. Would it be more benefitial to put my points into HF and Juke instead of soft capping my strength and vision or should I put my points in strength and vision and worry about Juke next season with my boost?
 
doc0629
offline
Link
 
I have seen with vision that some times backs start to dance around 2 much
 
spraybottle
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jbiller
If you plan to be a high speed / lower agility back, go all out in Head Fake. If you're balanced or more agility based I'd say go balanced between the two. Juke doesn't seem to help all that much, but Head Fake and Juke are simply amazing.


says who? >_>
 
Nuge20
offline
Link
 
Juke works well with 60ish agility but headfake is better for less agile backs
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.